[PATCH v2 1/6] net: mvneta: Add support for AlleyCat5
Pali Rohár
pali at kernel.org
Tue Sep 20 12:48:30 CEST 2022
On Tuesday 20 September 2022 20:31:48 Chris Packham wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/mvneta.c
> index d2c42c4396..07919d6d35 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mvneta.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mvneta.c
> @@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
> #define MVNETA_WIN_SIZE_MASK (0xffff0000)
> #define MVNETA_BASE_ADDR_ENABLE 0x2290
> #define MVNETA_BASE_ADDR_ENABLE_BIT 0x1
> +#define MVNETA_AC5_CNM_DDR_TARGET 0x2
> +#define MVNETA_AC5_CNM_DDR_ATTR 0xb
> #define MVNETA_PORT_ACCESS_PROTECT 0x2294
> #define MVNETA_PORT_ACCESS_PROTECT_WIN0_RW 0x3
> #define MVNETA_PORT_CONFIG 0x2400
> @@ -282,6 +284,8 @@ struct mvneta_port {
> struct gpio_desc phy_reset_gpio;
> struct gpio_desc sfp_tx_disable_gpio;
> #endif
> +
> + uintptr_t dma_base; /* base address for DMA address decoding */
> };
>
> /* The mvneta_tx_desc and mvneta_rx_desc structures describe the
> @@ -513,10 +517,19 @@ static void mvneta_rxq_desc_num_update(struct mvneta_port *pp,
> static struct mvneta_rx_desc *
> mvneta_rxq_next_desc_get(struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq)
> {
> + struct mvneta_rx_desc *curr;
> int rx_desc = rxq->next_desc_to_proc;
>
> + /* validate RX descriptor */
> + curr = rxq->descs + rx_desc;
> + if (curr->data_size == 0) {
> + /* do it to read real descriptor next time */
> + DSB;
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> rxq->next_desc_to_proc = MVNETA_QUEUE_NEXT_DESC(rxq, rx_desc);
> - return rxq->descs + rx_desc;
> + return curr;
> }
Hello! This change looks like some fix, and not related to AC5 support.
So it should be in separate patch as it affects all mvneta platforms,
not only AC5.
> @@ -1508,11 +1544,15 @@ static int mvneta_recv(struct udevice *dev, int flags, uchar **packetp)
> */
> rx_desc = mvneta_rxq_next_desc_get(rxq);
>
> + if (!rx_desc)
> + return 0;
> +
> rx_status = rx_desc->status;
> if (!mvneta_rxq_desc_is_first_last(rx_status) ||
> (rx_status & MVNETA_RXD_ERR_SUMMARY)) {
> mvneta_rx_error(pp, rx_desc);
> - /* leave the descriptor untouched */
> + /* invalidate the descriptor */
> + rx_desc->data_size = 0;
> return -EIO;
> }
ditto.
> @@ -1525,13 +1565,15 @@ static int mvneta_recv(struct udevice *dev, int flags, uchar **packetp)
> * No cache invalidation needed here, since the rx_buffer's are
> * located in a uncached memory region
> */
> - *packetp = data;
> + *packetp = data + pp->dma_base;
>
> /*
> * Only mark one descriptor as free
> * since only one was processed
> */
> mvneta_rxq_desc_num_update(pp, rxq, 1, 1);
> + /* invalidate the descriptor */
> + rx_desc->data_size = 0;
ditto.
> }
>
> return rx_bytes;
> @@ -1544,6 +1586,11 @@ static int mvneta_probe(struct udevice *dev)
> struct ofnode_phandle_args sfp_args;
> #endif
> void *bd_space;
> + void *blob = (void *)gd->fdt_blob;
> + int node = dev_of_offset(dev);
> + const int *cell;
> + int len;
> +
>
> /*
> * Allocate buffer area for descs and rx_buffers. This is only
> @@ -1577,9 +1624,21 @@ static int mvneta_probe(struct udevice *dev)
> /* Configure MBUS address windows */
> if (device_is_compatible(dev, "marvell,armada-3700-neta"))
> mvneta_bypass_mbus_windows(pp);
> + else if (device_is_compatible(dev, "marvell,armada-ac5-neta"))
> + mvneta_conf_ac5_cnm_xbar_windows(pp);
> else
> mvneta_conf_mbus_windows(pp);
>
> + /* fetch dma ranges property */
> + cell = fdt_getprop(blob, node, "dma-ranges", &len);
> + if (cell && len >= 4 * sizeof(int)) {
> + /* RAZA - TODO do that in loop by address-cells size */
> + pp->dma_base = fdt32_to_cpu(cell[1]);
> + pp->dma_base = (pp->dma_base << 32) | fdt32_to_cpu(cell[2]);
Probably it should be better to use some function for parsing dma-ranges
instead of open-coded implementation. It is not really clear why
cell[0] and cell[3] are ignored there, if it is missing intentionally or
it is a bug.
And... This should be used only for AC5, right?
> + } else {
> + pp->dma_base = 0;
> + }
> +
> #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_GPIO)
> if (!dev_read_phandle_with_args(dev, "sfp", NULL, 0, 0, &sfp_args) &&
> ofnode_is_enabled(sfp_args.node))
> @@ -1620,6 +1679,7 @@ static const struct eth_ops mvneta_ops = {
>
> static const struct udevice_id mvneta_ids[] = {
> { .compatible = "marvell,armada-370-neta" },
> + { .compatible = "marvell,armada-ac5-neta" },
> { .compatible = "marvell,armada-xp-neta" },
> { .compatible = "marvell,armada-3700-neta" },
> { }
> --
> 2.37.3
>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list