[u-boot][PATCH 1/3] scripts: Makefile.spl: Enable memory drivers to be built for SPL

Roger Quadros rogerq at kernel.org
Fri Sep 30 22:17:56 CEST 2022


On 30/09/2022 17:00, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 07:28:51AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Roger,
>>
>> On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 06:47, Roger Quadros <rogerq at kernel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Simon,
>>>
>>> On 29/09/2022 21:06, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>> Hi Roger,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 29 Sept 2022 at 01:03, Roger Quadros <rogerq at kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 28/09/2022 19:27, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Roger,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Sept 2022 at 06:12, Roger Quadros <rogerq at kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We will need ti-gpmc driver for SPL. Allow memory drivers
>>>>>>> do be built for SPL.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq at kernel.org>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>  scripts/Makefile.spl | 1 +
>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please can you use the existing drivers/ram directory?
>>>>>
>>>>> The ti-gpmc driver is not actually a RAM only controller. Although it can support SRAM.
>>>>> It is a more general purpose controller that can support different peripherals.
>>>>> It is similar to the drivers already existing in the divers/memory directory.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was just trying to keep the file layout similar to that in the Linux kernel.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you still see a problem with it?
>>>>
>>>> Well in this case perhaps the RAM device would be a child of this one?
>>>
>>> That's right.
>>>>
>>>> But there is no uclass for your new device. One of the drivers in that
>>>> dir uses UCLASS_NOP and your one seems to use UCLASS_SIMPLE_BUS
>>>>
>>>> So let's add a uclass for it and describe exactly what it is for.
>>>
>>> Why isn't UCLASS_SIMPLE_BUS sufficient?
>>> By itself, the GPMC driver doesn't offer any usable functionality.
>>> It just configures the bus interface and then populates the children.
>>
>> That's OK, but in that case it should go in drivers/bus and perhaps
>> drivers/memory should go away?
> 
> No, drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.c is there and is the equivalent (more
> or less) of drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.c in the linux kernel. So
> maybe a question is, are we talking about the equivalent of
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c here? Or something else?
> 

Yes, I just picked up that file and adapted it for u-boot. 
As GPMC is not only for OMAP devices anymore I renamed it to ti-gpmc.c.
If it helps we can retain the kernel naming.

cheers,
-roger


More information about the U-Boot mailing list