[PATCH] scripts/Makefile.lib: also consider $(CONFIG_SYS_BOARD)-u-boot.dtsi

[Rasmus Villemoes]

On 19/03/2023 20.29, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Rasmus,
> 
> On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 at 13:34, Rasmus Villemoes
> <rasmus.villemoes at prevas.dk> wrote:
>>
>> On 18/03/2023 21.20, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> Now, the only way to be really sure is to build the world
>>>> with/without this patch and check if any .dtb file changes, but I
>>>> don't have the means to do that. But I do notice that
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  doc/develop/devicetree/control.rst | 1 +
>>>>  scripts/Makefile.lib               | 2 ++
>>>>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>>
>>> There is something missing at the end of your note.
>>
>> Ah, sorry. I meant to say something about that it seems some existing
>> in-tree cases could make use of this and thus be simplified, e.g. all
>> the t8103-*-u-boot.dtsi just include t8103-u-boot.dtsi, but then I
>> wasn't really sure if that was a proper example, so decided to edit that
>> part out (but left that small fragment in).
>>
>>> What U-Boot-specific things are you using?
>>
>> Just the u-boot,dm-spl kind of stuff.
> 
> With the new bindings, we can put those tags (bootph-...) in the kernel DTs.

Hm, ok, but actually I was a bit too fast, there's also some binman
stuff, and a few things that I want/need to do for U-Boot but not the
kernel and vice versa (e.g. some gpio-hogs), so all in all, having this
patch in would still be very useful to me.

Rasmus