[PATCH] scripts/Makefile.lib: also consider $(CONFIG_SYS_BOARD)-u-boot.dtsi

[Simon Glass]

Hi Rasmus,

On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 at 05:05, Rasmus Villemoes
<rasmus.villemoes at prevas.dk> wrote:
>
> On 19/03/2023 20.29, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Rasmus,
> >
> > On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 at 13:34, Rasmus Villemoes
> > <rasmus.villemoes at prevas.dk> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 18/03/2023 21.20, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> Now, the only way to be really sure is to build the world
> >>>> with/without this patch and check if any .dtb file changes, but I
> >>>> don't have the means to do that. But I do notice that
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>  doc/develop/devicetree/control.rst | 1 +
> >>>>  scripts/Makefile.lib               | 2 ++
> >>>>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> >>>
> >>> There is something missing at the end of your note.
> >>
> >> Ah, sorry. I meant to say something about that it seems some existing
> >> in-tree cases could make use of this and thus be simplified, e.g. all
> >> the t8103-*-u-boot.dtsi just include t8103-u-boot.dtsi, but then I
> >> wasn't really sure if that was a proper example, so decided to edit that
> >> part out (but left that small fragment in).
> >>
> >>> What U-Boot-specific things are you using?
> >>
> >> Just the u-boot,dm-spl kind of stuff.
> >
> > With the new bindings, we can put those tags (bootph-...) in the kernel DTs.
>
> Hm, ok, but actually I was a bit too fast, there's also some binman
> stuff, and a few things that I want/need to do for U-Boot but not the
> kernel and vice versa (e.g. some gpio-hogs), so all in all, having this
> patch in would still be very useful to me.

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>

I have too many things open at the moment but at some point I will
look at upstreaming the binman bindings.

For gpio-hogs, can you send a patch to Linux?

Regards,
SImon