[RFC] riscv: visionfive2: use OF_BOARD_SETUP
Matthias Brugger
mbrugger at suse.com
Thu Apr 20 14:19:22 CEST 2023
Hi Torsten,
On 20/04/2023 09:43, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> Hi Leo, thanks for the quick reply!
>
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 06:33:57 +0000
> Leo Liang <ycliang at andestech.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Torsten, Matthias,
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 02:34:03PM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 19/04/2023 13:28, Torsten Duwe wrote:
>
>>>> This is only a proof of concept; let me know if you like it and I
>>>> can add the other 12 DT patches to adjust_for_rev13b(), or maybe
>>>> start with 1.3b as the default and go the other way, or something
>>>> in between.
>
>> LGTM as well!
>
> Thank you very much! Again, this is only a PoC; if you agree with the
> concept, I clean it up and fill in the complete DT patching.
>
> Questions: shall I default to 1.3B and patch older 1.2A, or vice versa,
> or do it like your (starfive) patch set and start with something
> "neutral" and then patch both ways? And, more important, what is the
I would go with the common case (I suppose that's version 1.3B) and detect and
patch older version 1.2A.
Regards,
Matthias
> correct interpretation of the board revision byte -- I assume it's
> offset 0x76 in the EEPROM? Is it always? Is ">= 0xB2" the correct
> discriminator?
>
> Torsten
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list