[PATCH v3 11/19] am64x: dts: binman: Package tiboot3.bin, tispl.bin u-boot.img

Simon Glass sjg at chromium.org
Mon Apr 24 21:42:26 CEST 2023


Hi Neha,

On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 06:32, Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis at ti.com> wrote:
>
> Support added for HS and GP boot binaries for AM64x.
>
> tiboot3.bin, tispl.bin and u-boot.img: For HS-SE devices
> tiboot3.bin_fs, tispl.bin and u-boot.img: For HS-FS devices
> tiboot3.bin_unsigned, tispl.bin_unsigned, u-boot.img_unsigned: For GP
> devices
>
> Note that the bootflow followed by AM64x requires:
>
> tiboot3.bin:
>         * R5 SPL
>         * R5 SPL dtbs
>         * sysfw
>         * board-cfg
>         * pm-cfg
>         * sec-cfg
>         * rm-cfg
>
> tispl.bin:
>         * ATF
>         * OPTEE
>         * A53 SPL
>         * A53 SPL dtbs
>
> u-boot.img:
>         * A53 U-Boot
>         * A53 U-Boot dtbs
>
> Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis at ti.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/dts/k3-am642-evm-u-boot.dtsi |   2 +
>  arch/arm/dts/k3-am642-r5-evm.dts      |   1 +
>  arch/arm/dts/k3-am64x-binman.dtsi     | 569 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  board/ti/am64x/Kconfig                |   2 +
>  4 files changed, 574 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/k3-am64x-binman.dtsi

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>

I notice that some of the entries are optional. Do you actual make use
of this (i.e. that when they are missing binman removes the entries)?

Regards,
Simon


More information about the U-Boot mailing list