[PATCH 6/6] stm32mp15: Use u-boot-spl-stm32.bin instead of u-boot-spl.stm32
Marek Vasut
marex at denx.de
Thu Aug 24 17:26:03 CEST 2023
On 8/24/23 17:14, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 05:09:07PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 8/24/23 16:25, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 05:12:45AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> On 8/24/23 05:02, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>>> A '.stm32' extension is not allowed anymore, so change it.
>>>>
>>>> Why?
>>>>
>>>> This will likely break a huge amount of scripts, I'm tempted to NAK it
>>>> unless there is a very good reason.
>>>
>>> This is in the cover letter. Today, buildman --keep-outputs doesn't
>>> actually keep the needed for booting outputs from a build for a number
>>> of platforms. Simon's response is to stop having a free-form list of
>>> outputs. With I guess the caveat being ROM-defined names (for example,
>>> we still keep "MLO" because that is the literal filename TI ROM looks
>>> for on FAT partitions, on mos of their 32bit platforms).
>>
>> Why not just place the free-form files into some output/ directory and be
>> done with it ? Then they can have whatever extension they want, as long as
>> the output/ directory name is stable.
>
> Yes, an alternative here is to just extend the list that's removed in
> patch 2/6.
I ... am not on CC of that patch ...
It would be really good if Simon CCed everyone involved on all the patches.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list