Failed to build u-boot.itb on RK3568

[Tom Rini]

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 05:47:27PM +0100, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 5:46 PM Jagan Teki <jagan at edgeble.ai> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 at 22:14, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Jagan Teki <jagan at edgeble.ai>
> > > > Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 21:57:57 +0530
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > The master branch seems broken with recent changes on binman, I found
> > > > that u-boot.itb is not creating for evb-rk3568 boards.
> > > >
> > > > HEAD
> > > > commit 17e8e58fe62c019b2cc26af221b6defc3368229f
> > > > Merge: 4e1ab2065e cd108f2795
> > > > Author: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
> > > > Date:   Tue Jan 24 21:07:01 2023 -0500
> > > >
> > > > Any insight?
> > >
> > > Well, here is my insight:
> > >
> > > As long as the only board supported board in mainline is an evaluation
> > > board that nobody in the community has, it won't be tested.  Can we
> > > somehow make progress in getting some of the more popular RK356x
> > > boards (like the quartz64, nanopi r5s, raxda rock 3) in the tree?
> >
> > fyi: radxa-cm3 is part of Mailing list.
> 
> Maybe we should setup some embedded lab, with boards. We are working
> to create some new testing boards to
> be use remotely for CI and developers. Do we have a way to make this
> setup for u-boot?

I would really like to see someone leverage the lab management used by
kernelci and then monitor U-Boot trees and leverage
https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot-test-hooks for the flash / etc
portion required to run our current test suite.  Currently we just have
some ad-hoc labs that do this.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20230126/014f9655/attachment.sig>