[PATCH 1/6] board: ti: am64x: Recognize AM64-HSEVM

Roger Quadros rogerq at kernel.org
Wed Jul 5 10:01:48 CEST 2023



On 04/07/2023 21:10, Roger Quadros wrote:
> use "am64x_evm" board name in environment for both AM64-GPEVM and
> AM64-HSEVM.
> 
> Gets rid of "Unidentified board claims AM64-HSEVM in eeprom header"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq at kernel.org>
> ---
>  board/ti/am64x/evm.c | 11 ++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/board/ti/am64x/evm.c b/board/ti/am64x/evm.c
> index 96f4e3013a..42795cbd22 100644
> --- a/board/ti/am64x/evm.c
> +++ b/board/ti/am64x/evm.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,8 @@
>  
>  #include "../common/board_detect.h"
>  
> -#define board_is_am64x_gpevm()	board_ti_k3_is("AM64-GPEVM")
> +#define board_is_am64x_evm()	(board_ti_k3_is("AM64-GPEVM") || \
> +				board_ti_k3_is("AM64-HSEVM"))
>  
>  #define board_is_am64x_skevm() (board_ti_k3_is("AM64-SKEVM") || \
>  				board_ti_k3_is("AM64B-SKEVM"))
> @@ -57,7 +58,7 @@ int board_fit_config_name_match(const char *name)
>  {
>  	bool eeprom_read = board_ti_was_eeprom_read();
>  
> -	if (!eeprom_read || board_is_am64x_gpevm()) {
> +	if (!eeprom_read || board_is_am64x_evm()) {
>  		if (!strcmp(name, "k3-am642-r5-evm") || !strcmp(name, "k3-am642-evm"))
>  			return 0;
>  	} else if (board_is_am64x_skevm()) {
> @@ -182,13 +183,13 @@ int checkboard(void)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BOARD_LATE_INIT
>  static void setup_board_eeprom_env(void)
>  {
> -	char *name = "am64x_gpevm";
> +	char *name = "am64x_evm";
>  
>  	if (do_board_detect())
>  		goto invalid_eeprom;
>  
> -	if (board_is_am64x_gpevm())
> -		name = "am64x_gpevm";
> +	if (board_is_am64x_evm())
> +		name = "am64x_evm";

"board/ti/am64x/am64x.env:    if test $board_name = am64x_gpevm; then"

So I think it was a bad idea to change the name here.
Will revert this change. 

>  	else if (board_is_am64x_skevm())
>  		name = "am64x_skevm";
>  	else

-- 
cheers,
-roger


More information about the U-Boot mailing list