[PATCH 12/12] binman: Support simple templates

Jan Kiszka jan.kiszka at siemens.com
Fri Jul 7 19:46:44 CEST 2023


On 07.07.23 19:35, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Jan,
> 
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 17:03, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka at siemens.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 07.07.23 17:35, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Jan,
>>>
>>> On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 14:56, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka at siemens.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 07.07.23 14:42, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>>> Hi Jan,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 11:05, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka at siemens.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05.07.23 00:14, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Jan,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 at 20:34, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka at siemens.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 28.06.23 13:41, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Collections can used to collect the contents of other entries into a
>>>>>>>>> single entry, but they result in a single entry, with the original entries
>>>>>>>>> 'left behind' in their old place.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It is useful to be able to specific a set of entries ones and have it used
>>>>>>>>> in multiple images, or parts of an image.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Implement this mechanism.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  tools/binman/binman.rst                  | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>  tools/binman/control.py                  |  9 +++
>>>>>>>>>  tools/binman/etype/section.py            |  3 +-
>>>>>>>>>  tools/binman/ftest.py                    |  8 +++
>>>>>>>>>  tools/binman/test/286_entry_template.dts | 42 +++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>  5 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>>>>  create mode 100644 tools/binman/test/286_entry_template.dts
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/tools/binman/binman.rst b/tools/binman/binman.rst
>>>>>>>>> index a4b31fe5397b..9be979ae1c5b 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/tools/binman/binman.rst
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/tools/binman/binman.rst
>>>>>>>>> @@ -727,6 +727,13 @@ optional:
>>>>>>>>>      Note that missing, optional blobs do not produce a non-zero exit code from
>>>>>>>>>      binman, although it does show a warning about the missing external blob.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +insert-template:
>>>>>>>>> +    This is not strictly speaking an entry property, since it is processed early
>>>>>>>>> +    in Binman before the entries are read. It is a list of phandles of nodes to
>>>>>>>>> +    include in the current (target) node. For each node, its subnodes and their
>>>>>>>>> +    properties are brought into the target node. See Templates_ below for
>>>>>>>>> +    more information.
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>  The attributes supported for images and sections are described below. Several
>>>>>>>>>  are similar to those for entries.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> @@ -1172,6 +1179,79 @@ If you are having trouble figuring out what is going on, you can use
>>>>>>>>>       arch/arm/dts/u-boot.dtsi ... found: "arch/arm/dts/juno-r2-u-boot.dtsi"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +Templates
>>>>>>>>> +=========
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +Sometimes multiple images need to be created which have all have a common
>>>>>>>>> +part. For example, a board may generate SPI and eMMC images which both include
>>>>>>>>> +a FIT. Since the FIT includes many entries, it is tedious to repeat them twice
>>>>>>>>> +in the image description.
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +Templates provide a simple way to handle this::
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +    binman {
>>>>>>>>> +        multiple-images;
>>>>>>>>> +        common_part: template-1 {
>>>>>>>>> +            fit {
>>>>>>>>> +                ... lots of entries in here
>>>>>>>>> +            };
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +            text {
>>>>>>>>> +                text = "base image";
>>>>>>>>> +            };
>>>>>>>>> +        };
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +        spi-image {
>>>>>>>>> +            filename = "image-spi.bin";
>>>>>>>>> +            insert-template = <&fit>;
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +            /* things specific to SPI follow */
>>>>>>>>> +            header {
>>>>>>>>> +            ];
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +            text {
>>>>>>>>> +                text = "SPI image";
>>>>>>>>> +            };
>>>>>>>>> +        };
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +        mmc-image {
>>>>>>>>> +            filename = "image-mmc.bin";
>>>>>>>>> +            insert-template = <&fit>;
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +            /* things specific to MMC follow */
>>>>>>>>> +            header {
>>>>>>>>> +            ];
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +            text {
>>>>>>>>> +                text = "MMC image";
>>>>>>>>> +            };
>>>>>>>>> +        };
>>>>>>>>> +    };
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +The template node name must start with 'template', so it is not considered to be
>>>>>>>>> +an image itself.
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +The mechanism is very simple. For each phandle in the 'insert-templates'
>>>>>>>>> +property, the source node is looked up. Then the subnodes of that source node
>>>>>>>>> +are copied into the target node, i.e. the one containing the `insert-template`
>>>>>>>>> +property.
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +If the target node has a node with the same name as a template, its properties
>>>>>>>>> +override corresponding properties in the template. This allows the template to
>>>>>>>>> +be uses as a base, with the node providing updates to the properties as needed.
>>>>>>>>> +The overriding happens recursively.
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +At present there is an unpleasant limitation on this feature: it works by
>>>>>>>>> +appending the template nodes after any existing subnodes to the target node.
>>>>>>>>> +This means that if the target node includes any subnodes, these appear in order
>>>>>>>>> +before the template node. In the above example, 'header' becomes the first
>>>>>>>>> +subnode of each image, followed by `fit` and `text`. If this is not what is
>>>>>>>>> +desired, there is no way to adjust it.
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +Note: The above limitation will likely be removed in future, so that the
>>>>>>>>> +template subnodes appear before the target subnodes.
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>  Updating an ELF file
>>>>>>>>>  ====================
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/tools/binman/control.py b/tools/binman/control.py
>>>>>>>>> index 68597c4e7792..e7faca78e9aa 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/tools/binman/control.py
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/tools/binman/control.py
>>>>>>>>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ from binman import bintool
>>>>>>>>>  from binman import cbfs_util
>>>>>>>>>  from binman import elf
>>>>>>>>>  from binman import entry
>>>>>>>>> +from dtoc import fdt_util
>>>>>>>>>  from u_boot_pylib import command
>>>>>>>>>  from u_boot_pylib import tools
>>>>>>>>>  from u_boot_pylib import tout
>>>>>>>>> @@ -478,6 +479,12 @@ def SignEntries(image_fname, input_fname, privatekey_fname, algo, entry_paths,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>      AfterReplace(image, allow_resize=True, write_map=write_map)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +def _ProcessTemplates(parent):
>>>>>>>>> +    for node in parent.subnodes:
>>>>>>>>> +        tmpl = fdt_util.GetPhandleList(node, 'insert-template')
>>>>>>>>> +        if tmpl:
>>>>>>>>> +            node.copy_subnodes_from_phandles(tmpl)
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>  def PrepareImagesAndDtbs(dtb_fname, select_images, update_fdt, use_expanded):
>>>>>>>>>      """Prepare the images to be processed and select the device tree
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> @@ -520,6 +527,8 @@ def PrepareImagesAndDtbs(dtb_fname, select_images, update_fdt, use_expanded):
>>>>>>>>>          raise ValueError("Device tree '%s' does not have a 'binman' "
>>>>>>>>>                              "node" % dtb_fname)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +    _ProcessTemplates(node)
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>      images = _ReadImageDesc(node, use_expanded)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>      if select_images:
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/tools/binman/etype/section.py b/tools/binman/etype/section.py
>>>>>>>>> index d56cc11d1023..adac2ff7fa87 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/tools/binman/etype/section.py
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/tools/binman/etype/section.py
>>>>>>>>> @@ -179,7 +179,8 @@ class Entry_section(Entry):
>>>>>>>>>          Returns:
>>>>>>>>>              bool: True if the node is a special one, else False
>>>>>>>>>          """
>>>>>>>>> -        return node.name.startswith('hash') or node.name.startswith('signature')
>>>>>>>>> +        start_list = ('hash', 'signature', 'template')
>>>>>>>>> +        return any(node.name.startswith(name) for name in start_list)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>      def ReadNode(self):
>>>>>>>>>          """Read properties from the section node"""
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/tools/binman/ftest.py b/tools/binman/ftest.py
>>>>>>>>> index 4db54c69682c..9d9e47ce26b0 100644
>>>>>>>>> --- a/tools/binman/ftest.py
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/tools/binman/ftest.py
>>>>>>>>> @@ -6763,6 +6763,14 @@ fdt         fdtmap                Extract the devicetree blob from the fdtmap
>>>>>>>>>          data = self._DoReadFileDtb('285_spl_expand.dts',
>>>>>>>>>                                     use_expanded=True, entry_args=entry_args)[0]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +    def testEntryTemplate(self):
>>>>>>>>> +        """Test using a template"""
>>>>>>>>> +        TestFunctional._MakeInputFile('vga2.bin', b'#' + VGA_DATA)
>>>>>>>>> +        data = self._DoReadFile('286_entry_template.dts')
>>>>>>>>> +        first = U_BOOT_DTB_DATA + U_BOOT_DATA + VGA_DATA
>>>>>>>>> +        second = U_BOOT_DTB_DATA + b'#' + VGA_DATA + U_BOOT_DATA
>>>>>>>>> +        self.assertEqual(U_BOOT_IMG_DATA + first + second, data)
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  if __name__ == "__main__":
>>>>>>>>>      unittest.main()
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/tools/binman/test/286_entry_template.dts b/tools/binman/test/286_entry_template.dts
>>>>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>>>>> index 000000000000..6980dbfafcc6
>>>>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>>>>> +++ b/tools/binman/test/286_entry_template.dts
>>>>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
>>>>>>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +/dts-v1/;
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +/ {
>>>>>>>>> +     #address-cells = <1>;
>>>>>>>>> +     #size-cells = <1>;
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +     binman {
>>>>>>>>> +             u-boot-img {
>>>>>>>>> +             };
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +             common_part: template {
>>>>>>>>> +                     u-boot {
>>>>>>>>> +                     };
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +                     intel-vga {
>>>>>>>>> +                             filename = "vga.bin";
>>>>>>>>> +                     };
>>>>>>>>> +             };
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +             first {
>>>>>>>>> +                     type = "section";
>>>>>>>>> +                     insert-template = <&common_part>;
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +                     u-boot-dtb {
>>>>>>>>> +                     };
>>>>>>>>> +             };
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +             second {
>>>>>>>>> +                     type = "section";
>>>>>>>>> +                     insert-template = <&common_part>;
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +                     u-boot-dtb {
>>>>>>>>> +                     };
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +                     intel-vga {
>>>>>>>>> +                             filename = "vga2.bin";
>>>>>>>>> +                     };
>>>>>>>>> +             };
>>>>>>>>> +     };
>>>>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I tried to apply this on the IOT2050 use case, but it failed in two cases:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. We need a template where nodes can be manipulated afterwards, thus we
>>>>>>>> need anchors into those nodes. Naturally, those anchors need to get
>>>>>>>> unique names so that something like this is possible:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> common: template {
>>>>>>>>         anchor: some-node {
>>>>>>>>                 value-1 = <1>;
>>>>>>>>         };
>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> user-a {
>>>>>>>>         insert-template = <&common>;
>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> user-b {
>>>>>>>>         insert-template = <&common>;
>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> &anchor-a {
>>>>>>>>         value-2 = <2>;
>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> &anchor-b {
>>>>>>>>         value-2 = <3>;
>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rather than using a phandle, can you not use the node name in the
>>>>>>> template? For example:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> user-a {
>>>>>>>    insert-template = <&common>;
>>>>>>>    some-node {
>>>>>>>       value2 = <2>;
>>>>>>>   }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> user-b {
>>>>>>>    insert-template = <&common>;
>>>>>>>    some-node {
>>>>>>>       value2 = <3>;
>>>>>>>   }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't think this is working already. This is what I tried:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /dts-v1/;
>>>>>> / {
>>>>>>         binman: binman {
>>>>>>                 multiple-images;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 my_template: template {
>>>>>>                         blob-ext at 0 {
>>>>>>                                 filename = "my-blob.bin";
>>>>>>                                 offset = <0>;
>>>>>>                         };
>>>>>>                         blob-ext at 100 {
>>>>>>                                 filename = "/dev/null";
>>>>>>                                 offset = <0x100>;
>>>>>>                         };
>>>>>>                 };
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 my-image {
>>>>>>                         filename = "my-image.bin";
>>>>>>                         insert-template = <&my_template>;
>>>>>>                         blob-ext at 100 {
>>>>>>                                 filename = "my-blob2.bin";
>>>>>>                         };
>>>>>>                 };
>>>>>>         };
>>>>>> };
>>>>>>
>>>>>> First, I had to apply that null filename workaround, and the overridden
>>>>>> filename is taken for the final image (if I leave out blob-ext at 0), but
>>>>>> this is at least ugly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, the file above as-is does not build:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> binman: Node '/binman/my-image/blob-ext at 0': Offset 0x0 (0) overlaps with
>>>>>> previous entry '/binman/my-image/blob-ext at 100' ending at 0x107 (263)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Probably for the same reason, leaving fit,fdt-list-val out in a template
>>>>>> also generates an error during build. Putting an empty string there and
>>>>>> overriding it later does not work.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it is just that it doesn't support templating of
>>>>> multiple-images nodes property. I sent a patch for this [1]
>>>>>
>>>>> There may be other cases too, but if you have a failure, please see if
>>>>> you can adjust that test (287) to fail for you.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hmm, already the test pattern from [1] still gives me
>>>>
>>>> binman: Node '/binman/image/blob-ext at 0': Offset 0x0 (0) overlaps with
>>>> previous entry '/binman/image/blob-ext at 8' ending at 0xf (15)
>>>>
>>>> I've applied this series and then [1] on top.
>>>
>>> Can you please list the commits so I can check it? I have:
>>>
>>> 88a31cccc20 (HEAD -> mkim2, dm/mkim-working) binman: Support
>>> templating with multiple images
>>> 71f1ef46d0c (dm-public/mkim-working) binman: Support simple templates
>>> 8841829b4c8 dtoc: Allow inserting a list of nodes into another
>>> fd2fb91c616 dtoc: Support copying the contents of a node into another
>>> 288f9e7c3b6 binman: Correct handling of zero bss size
>>> 4725a43d0ef binman: Drop __bss_size variable in bss_data.c
>>> c4bfe4917c9 binman: Provide a way to specific the fdt-list directly
>>> 6e571e4d260 binman: Convert mkimage to Entry_section
>>> 5fd2892283f stm32mp15: Avoid writing symbols in SPL
>>> 24c60031f48 binman: Allow disabling symbol writing
>>> 5c6a660333c binman: Read _multiple_data_files in the correct place
>>> 24a273113bf binman: Use GetEntries() to obtain section contents
>>> 1e0659321d8 binman: Init align_default in entry_Section
>>> cc3699d1d04 binman: Correct coverage gap in control
>>> 67d8b46e6ef (us/WIP/28Jun2023-next) Merge tag
>>> 'u-boot-amlogic-next-20230628' of
>>> https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-amlogic into next
>>>
>>
>> I was using the dtoc patches from this series, not the updated but
>> apparently not yet sent ones from your branch. Those seem to make a
>> difference. Continuing to test.
> 
> I thought I did send out v2. There are some test fails with large
> numbers of CPUs which I need to fix in v3, but anyway, please use the
> branch I pushed for testing, and sorry for any discrepancy.
> 

Doing this now. And here is the next issue - maybe the last:

/dts-v1/;

/ {
	binman: binman {
		multiple-images;

		my_template: template {
			fit at 0 {
				images {
					kernel-1 {
					};
					kernel-2 {
					};
				};
			};
		};

		image {
			filename = "my-image.bin";
			insert-template = <&my_template>;

			fit at 0 {
				images {
					kernel-3 {
					};
				};
			};
		};
	};
};

Gives

binman: pylibfdt error -4: FDT_ERR_BADOFFSET

when trying to build it. That subnode kernel-3 can't be added.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Technology
Competence Center Embedded Linux



More information about the U-Boot mailing list