[EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] common: Kconfig: Fix CMD_BMP/BMP dependency

Nikhil M Jain n-jain1 at ti.com
Fri Jul 14 09:39:02 CEST 2023



On 10/07/23 20:36, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 07:18:10PM -0400, Samuel Dionne-Riel wrote:
> 
>> Using `default y` will not select BMP when CMD_BMP has been enabled, if
>> it was already configured.
>>
>> By using `select`, if `CMD_BMP` is turned on, it will force the presence
>> of `BMP`.
>>
>> Fixes: 072b0e16c482114d242580dd7a3197db5966705f
> 
> The fixes tag should be the "git log -n1 --oneline" version of the
> commit, btw.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Samuel Dionne-Riel <samuel at dionne-riel.com>
>> ---
>>   cmd/Kconfig    | 1 +
>>   common/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/cmd/Kconfig b/cmd/Kconfig
>> index 02e54f1e50..94c54b2359 100644
>> --- a/cmd/Kconfig
>> +++ b/cmd/Kconfig
>> @@ -1988,6 +1988,7 @@ config CMD_2048
>>   config CMD_BMP
>>   	bool "Enable 'bmp' command"
>>   	depends on VIDEO
>> +	select BMP
>>   	help
>>   	  This provides a way to obtain information about a BMP-format image
>>   	  and to display it. BMP (which presumably stands for BitMaP) is a
>> diff --git a/common/Kconfig b/common/Kconfig
>> index bbabadb35e..d0117e3dc8 100644
>> --- a/common/Kconfig
>> +++ b/common/Kconfig
>> @@ -1157,7 +1157,7 @@ config IO_TRACE
>>   
>>   config BMP
>>   	bool "Enable bmp image display"
>> -	default y if CMD_BMP
>> +	default n
>>   	help
>>   	  Enable bmp functions to display bmp image and get bmp info.
> 
> Since this is something that can be resolved by correcting the resulting
> .config file (or storing a new defconfig in your build system, or what
> have you) I'm not grabbing this for the release I'll be doing later
> today.  Also in a v2, "default n" is the default. And I'm not entirely
> sure if BMP (and SPL_BMP) end up being things that should be asked, or
> should be select'd because they're library functions. Finally, this
> should perhaps be part of
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=360683&state=*
> but I'm not sure and will wait for Nikhil to chime in.
> 
@Samuel, is it okay if I pick this patch and send it as a patch as part 
of my above mentioned series with the changes suggested by Tom?


More information about the U-Boot mailing list