[PATCH v1] HSD #18028953892: usb: xhci-dwc3: Fix USB3.1 controller register access in reset state

Lim, Jit Loon jit.loon.lim at intel.com
Fri Jul 21 05:26:03 CEST 2023


Hi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> Sent: Friday, 7 July, 2023 5:50 AM
> To: Lim, Jit Loon <jit.loon.lim at intel.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Cc: Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>; Simon
> <simon.k.r.goldschmidt at gmail.com>; Chee, Tien Fong
> <tien.fong.chee at intel.com>; Hea, Kok Kiang <kok.kiang.hea at intel.com>;
> Lokanathan, Raaj <raaj.lokanathan at intel.com>; Maniyam, Dinesh
> <dinesh.maniyam at intel.com>; Ng, Boon Khai <boon.khai.ng at intel.com>;
> Yuslaimi, Alif Zakuan <alif.zakuan.yuslaimi at intel.com>; Chong, Teik Heng
> <teik.heng.chong at intel.com>; Zamri, Muhammad Hazim Izzat
> <muhammad.hazim.izzat.zamri at intel.com>; Tang, Sieu Mun
> <sieu.mun.tang at intel.com>; Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>; Michal
> Simek <monstr at monstr.eu>; Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>; Eugen Hristev
> <eugen.hristev at microchip.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] HSD #18028953892: usb: xhci-dwc3: Fix USB3.1
> controller register access in reset state
> 
> On 6/22/23 16:08, Lim, Jit Loon wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> >> Sent: Thursday, 22 June, 2023 5:35 PM
> >> To: Lim, Jit Loon <jit.loon.lim at intel.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> >> Cc: Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>; Simon
> >> <simon.k.r.goldschmidt at gmail.com>; Chee, Tien Fong
> >> <tien.fong.chee at intel.com>; Hea, Kok Kiang <kok.kiang.hea at intel.com>;
> >> Lokanathan, Raaj <raaj.lokanathan at intel.com>; Maniyam, Dinesh
> >> <dinesh.maniyam at intel.com>; Ng, Boon Khai
> <boon.khai.ng at intel.com>;
> >> Yuslaimi, Alif Zakuan <alif.zakuan.yuslaimi at intel.com>; Chong, Teik
> >> Heng <teik.heng.chong at intel.com>; Zamri, Muhammad Hazim Izzat
> >> <muhammad.hazim.izzat.zamri at intel.com>; Tang, Sieu Mun
> >> <sieu.mun.tang at intel.com>; Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>; Michal
> >> Simek <monstr at monstr.eu>; Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>; Eugen
> >> Hristev <eugen.hristev at microchip.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] HSD #18028953892: usb: xhci-dwc3: Fix USB3.1
> >> controller register access in reset state
> >>
> >> On 6/22/23 04:48, Lim, Jit Loon wrote:
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, 21 June, 2023 10:19 PM
> >>>> To: Lim, Jit Loon <jit.loon.lim at intel.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> >>>> Cc: Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>; Simon
> >>>> <simon.k.r.goldschmidt at gmail.com>; Chee, Tien Fong
> >>>> <tien.fong.chee at intel.com>; Hea, Kok Kiang
> >>>> <kok.kiang.hea at intel.com>; Lokanathan, Raaj
> >>>> <raaj.lokanathan at intel.com>; Maniyam, Dinesh
> >>>> <dinesh.maniyam at intel.com>; Ng, Boon Khai
> <boon.khai.ng at intel.com>;
> >>>> Yuslaimi, Alif Zakuan <alif.zakuan.yuslaimi at intel.com>; Chong, Teik
> >>>> Heng <teik.heng.chong at intel.com>; Zamri, Muhammad Hazim Izzat
> >>>> <muhammad.hazim.izzat.zamri at intel.com>; Tang, Sieu Mun
> >>>> <sieu.mun.tang at intel.com>; Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
> >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] HSD #18028953892: usb: xhci-dwc3: Fix
> >>>> USB3.1 controller register access in reset state
> >>>>
> >>>> On 6/21/23 16:11, Jit Loon Lim wrote:
> >>>>> From: Teik Heng Chong <teik.heng.chong at intel.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The controller registers should not be accessed while the
> >>>>> controller's vcc_reset_n is asserted.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Teik Heng Chong <teik.heng.chong at intel.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Is this patch ported from Linux or is this custom development ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Is there a matching patch/fix in Linux already ?
> >>>
> >>> In xhci_dwc3_probe(), the program sequence is vcc reset -> clk init
> >>> -> phy setup -> xhci_register therefore, when xhci_dwc3_remove is
> >>> called, the proper usb stop sequence should be xhci_register _> phy
> >>> setup -> clk init -> vcc reset
> >>>
> >>> if we look at linux driver
> >>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3
> >>> -o
> >>> f-simple.c#L33
> >>>
> >>> dwc3_of_simple_probe: The sequence is reset -> clock
> >>> __dwc3_of_simple_teardown: Then, clock -> reset
> >>>
> >>> So based on the above, we have made changes and the uboot fix is now
> >> aligned with linux driver.
> >>
> >> Instead of adding random patches to the U-Boot dwc3 driver, please
> >> just synchronize the driver with Linux. You should be able to add the
> >> missing patches to the DWC3 driver from Linux since the last
> >> synchronization point, the process should be largely mechanical. Make
> >> sure to include commit ID of each Linux commit in the new matching U-
> Boot patch.
> >>
> >> It shouldn't be difficult, one approach I can think of is roughly this:
> >> - figure out the original merge base from which the DWC3 driver was
> >> imported to U-Boot
> >> - in U-Boot, revert all dwc3 patches on top of that import patch
> >> - pick all Linux kernel dwc3 patches from that merge base and apply
> >> on top of this U-Boot with reverts
> >> - Run rebase and drop the reverts, let git drop duplicate patches
> >
> > We believed the previous reply from us is a bit confusing.
> > There is no exact same function/file for U-Boot to use in Linux.
> > What we are doing is, we are referring to Linux sequence.
> >
> > Linux:  (dwc3_of_simple_probe)
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-o
> > f-simple.c#L33
> > U-Boot: (xhci_dwc3_probe)
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/u-boot/latest/source/drivers/usb/host/xhci-
> > dwc3.c#L159
> >
> > Linux:  (__dwc3_of_simple_teardown)
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-o
> > f-simple.c#L98
> > U-Boot: (xhci_dwc3_remove)
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/u-boot/latest/source/drivers/usb/host/xhci-
> > dwc3.c#L227
> >
> > So we believed that we can't directly pickup all Linux kernel dwc3 patches
> and merge to U-Boot.
> 
> If you were to sync the driver from Linux to U-Boot, then the same sequence
> as Linux uses would be automatically used too, right ?
> 
> Sorry for the abysmal delay in my reply.

Are we saying that we shall port/use Linux driver in U-Boot and abandon the existing USB host driver in U-Boot?




More information about the U-Boot mailing list