[PATCH v2 1/1] efi_loader: error handling in tcg2_hash_pe_image()
Ilias Apalodimas
ilias.apalodimas at linaro.org
Mon Jul 31 15:04:15 CEST 2023
Hi Heinrich,
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 15:11, Heinrich Schuchardt
<heinrich.schuchardt at canonical.com> wrote:
>
> If the hard coded array hash_algo_list[] contains an entry for an
> unsupported algorithm, we should not leak resources new_efi and regs.
>
> We should still extend the log with the digests for the supported
> algorithms and not write any message.
>
> The same holds true of tcg2_create_digest(): just continue in case
> hash_algo_list[] contains an unsupported entry.
>
> Fixes: 163a0d7e2cbd ("efi_loader: add PE/COFF image measurement")
> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt at canonical.com>
> ---
> v2:
> drop the error message
> fix tcg2_create_digest() too
> ---
> lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c
> index 49f8a5e77c..7b7926a0d4 100644
> --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c
> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_tcg2.c
> @@ -706,8 +706,7 @@ static efi_status_t tcg2_create_digest(const u8 *input, u32 length,
> sha512_finish(&ctx_512, final);
> break;
> default:
> - EFI_PRINT("Unsupported algorithm %x\n", hash_alg);
> - return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> + continue;
> }
> digest_list->digests[digest_list->count].hash_alg = hash_alg;
> memcpy(&digest_list->digests[digest_list->count].digest, final,
> @@ -930,8 +929,7 @@ static efi_status_t tcg2_hash_pe_image(void *efi, u64 efi_size,
> hash_calculate("sha512", regs->reg, regs->num, hash);
> break;
> default:
> - EFI_PRINT("Unsupported algorithm %x\n", hash_alg);
> - return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> + continue;
> }
> digest_list->digests[digest_list->count].hash_alg = hash_alg;
> memcpy(&digest_list->digests[digest_list->count].digest, hash,
> --
> 2.40.1
>
I am fine with the change. It's worth noting that this will only
happen if we ever add an invalid algorithm to hash_algo_list[]. But
the algorithms are described in the spec, so we should never end up
in that case regardless. Can you pick this up via the EFI tree?
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas at linaro.org>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list