Pull request efi-2024-01-rc2

[Heinrich Schuchardt]

On 10/25/23 20:57, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 04:20:06AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
>> Dear Tom,
>>
>> The following changes since commit 5cab3515f8c9796015739c1750b8933291c816be:
>>
>>    Merge tag 'u-boot-rockchip-20231024' of
>> https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-rockchip (2023-10-24
>> 09:39:52 -0400)
>>
>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>
>>    https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-efi.git
>> tags/efi-2024-01-rc2
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to 916dad34af0e53181dfe21f5764d3a787cb24bdc:
>>
>>    efi_loader: fix EFI_ENTRY point on get_active_pcr_banks (2023-10-24
>> 23:56:43 +0200)
>>
>> Gitlab CI showed no issues:
>> https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-efi/-/pipelines/18293
>>
>
> So, there's not been enough time for "efi_loader: expose the device-tree
> file name" as there's still comments on how to word things there (and
> I'm fine taking this eventually for the release, we don't need it
> today).

You and Ilias marked this patch as reviewed.

Which comments should I look at?

> And since we're here anyways, "efi_loader: fix efi_dp_from_eth"
> isn't needed as with "sandbox: eliminate unused functions from binaries"
> we can build sandbox with EFI_LOADER=y NET=n LTO=n (and CMDLINE=n with
> the rest of my v4 + an unrelated to this fix for fastboot) and since I'm
> asking for changes anyhow, lets just drop this. Thanks.
>

I am fine with dropping the patch. Will you be moving that sandbox patch?

Best regards

Heinrich