[PATCH] .gitlab-ci: Test sandbox64 board in addition to sandbox
Tom Rini
trini at konsulko.com
Fri Sep 1 20:11:23 CEST 2023
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 10:48:10AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Test both 32bit and 64bit sandbox boards in CI.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas at mailbox.org>
> ---
> Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt at canonical.com>
> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> Cc: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
> ---
> DEPENDS:
> - [v2] test: print: Fix hexdump test on 64bit systems
> - test: dm: test-fdt: Use fdtdec_get_int() in dm_check_devices()
> - configs: sandbox64: Enable legacy image format support
> ---
> .gitlab-ci.yml | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.yml b/.gitlab-ci.yml
> index 6d7ffdd1bbc..a7282be3181 100644
> --- a/.gitlab-ci.yml
> +++ b/.gitlab-ci.yml
> @@ -291,6 +291,23 @@ sandbox without LTO test.py:
> BUILD_ENV: "NO_LTO=1"
> <<: *buildman_and_testpy_dfn
>
> +sandbox64 test.py:
> + variables:
> + TEST_PY_BD: "sandbox64"
> + <<: *buildman_and_testpy_dfn
> +
> +sandbox64 with clang test.py:
> + variables:
> + TEST_PY_BD: "sandbox64"
> + OVERRIDE: "-O clang-16"
> + <<: *buildman_and_testpy_dfn
> +
> +sandbox64 without LTO test.py:
> + variables:
> + TEST_PY_BD: "sandbox64"
> + BUILD_ENV: "NO_LTO=1"
> + <<: *buildman_and_testpy_dfn
I'm not sure it's worth building and testing sandbox64 without LTO as
well. The primary reason we do this here is to ensure that the NO_LTO
flag keeps working, rather than specific outputs from the tests, and we
should _probably_ change the current one to be a case where we just test
that the version test runs and passes.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20230901/5c7f4482/attachment.sig>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list