[PATCHv8 00/15] net/lwip: add lwip library for the network stack

[Tom Rini]

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 11:06:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > >> Then if for development you need  to pull he history of lwip, you can do it with:
> > >> git pull -s subtree lwip  master --allow-unrelated-histories
> > >> (but I think nobody will need this.)
> > >>
> > >> New update of the lwip net/lwip/lwip-external dir will be done with:
> > >> git pull -s subtree lwip  master --allow-unrelated-histories --squash
> > >> Squash commit also has to be git format-patch friendly.
> > >>
> > >> If you are ok with that proposal I will send v9 with the first patch created with steps above.
> > >
> > > We've gone through this before.  The whole purpose of this is not
> > > having to maintain patches.
> > > Simon, instead of "I had problems in the past", can you elaborate a bit more?
> > >
> > > Tom said he is fine with subtrees instead of submodules and I know for
> > > a fact EDK2 doesn't have too many issues with submodules.
> > > Their documentation is pretty clear on building and requires
> > >
> > > git clone https://github.com/tianocore/edk2.git
> > > cd edk2
> > > git submodule update --init
> > >
> > > Perhaps the situation has improved since you had issues?
> >
> > While I don't really care how you solve this technically, I'd *strongly*
> > be interested for U-Boot to use *unmodified* lwIP sources where an
> > explicit reference to an lwIP commit is used. I'd rather integrate
> > bugfixes for U-Boot into lwIP than having the sources drift apart.
> 
> Strongly agree here, we want to use upstream and all the combined
> development and reviews etc rather than forking off and ending up with
> yet another slightly different IP stack. The whole advantage of
> adopting LWIP is the advantage of combined security, features and bugs
> from a wide range of projects :-)

Yes, this is what I want as well, and why I'm perhaps more agreeable
with the approaches where it's a lot harder for us to start forking
things unintentionally.  I gather submodule rather than subtree would be
better for that case?

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20230913/e4fc9220/attachment.sig>