[PATCH v3 06/16] remoteproc: k3-r5: Extend support for R5F clusters on J784S4 SoCs
Apurva Nandan
a-nandan at ti.com
Tue Sep 19 19:40:56 CEST 2023
Hi,
On 09/09/23 16:26, Roger Quadros wrote:
>
> On 08/09/2023 14:05, Apurva Nandan wrote:
>> From: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla at ti.com>
>>
>> The K3 J784S4 SoCs have four dual-core R5F subsystems, one in MCU
>> voltage domain and the other three in MAIN voltage domain. These R5F
>> clusters are similar to the R5F clusters in J7200 and J721S2 SoCs.
>>
>> Extend support to the R5F clusters for J784S4 with J721S2 compatible
>> string.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla at ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Apurva Nandan <a-nandan at ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5f_rproc.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5f_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5f_rproc.c
>> index 6f3e12d915..631e548dcc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5f_rproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5f_rproc.c
>> @@ -855,7 +855,7 @@ static const struct k3_r5f_ip_data k3_data = {
>> .tcm_ecc_autoinit = false,
>> };
>>
>> -static const struct k3_r5f_ip_data j7200_data = {
>> +static const struct k3_r5f_ip_data j7200_j721s2_data = {
> No need to rename this.
Okay
>
>> .tcm_is_double = true,
>> .tcm_ecc_autoinit = true,
>> };
>> @@ -863,7 +863,8 @@ static const struct k3_r5f_ip_data j7200_data = {
>> static const struct udevice_id k3_r5f_rproc_ids[] = {
>> { .compatible = "ti,am654-r5f", .data = (ulong)&k3_data, },
>> { .compatible = "ti,j721e-r5f", .data = (ulong)&k3_data, },
>> - { .compatible = "ti,j7200-r5f", .data = (ulong)&j7200_data, },
>> + { .compatible = "ti,j7200-r5f", .data = (ulong)&j7200_j721s2_data, },
>> + { .compatible = "ti,j721s2-r5f", .data = (ulong)&j7200_j721s2_data, },
> Where is DT binding documentation for this?
>
> Don't you need compatible for ti,j728s4-r5f?
We don't actually need a new compatible for j784s4 r5f, as
it is the same IP as on j721s2 and j7200. It uses same ip data
in the driver as well.
>
>> {}
>> };
>>
>> @@ -901,6 +902,7 @@ static const struct udevice_id k3_r5fss_ids[] = {
>> { .compatible = "ti,am654-r5fss"},
>> { .compatible = "ti,j721e-r5fss"},
>> { .compatible = "ti,j7200-r5fss"},
>> + { .compatible = "ti,j721s2-r5fss"},
>> {}
>> };
>>
--
Thanks and regards,
Apurva Nandan,
Texas Instruments India.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list