[Question] TI's u-boot.img is built twice
Masahiro Yamada
masahiroy at kernel.org
Thu Sep 21 17:36:02 CEST 2023
Hi.
Since the TI platform migrated to binman,
u-boot.img is built twice.
It is created by "mkimage -E",
then overwritten by binman.
So, the data are embedded in the FIT structure
instead of being appended.
Is this intentional?
To me, it looks weird.
To confirm it, apply the following hack.
Since u-boot.img is overwritten by binman,
copy it to u-boot.img.backup.
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 87f9fc786e..4cffa8a061 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -1112,6 +1112,7 @@ endef
# Timestamp file to make sure that binman always runs
.binman_stamp: $(INPUTS-y) FORCE
ifeq ($(CONFIG_BINMAN),y)
+ cp u-boot.img u-boot.img.backup
$(call if_changed,binman)
endif
@touch $@
Then, build it for the main core.
make -j$(nproc) CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu-
am64x_evm_a53_defconfig all
TEE=~/ref/OP-TEE/optee_os/out/arm-plat-k3/core/tee-raw.bin
BL31=~/ref/trusted-firmware-a/build/k3/lite/release/bl31.bin
BINMAN_INDIRS=~/ref/ti-linux-firmware
Compare the two files.
Run fdtdump to see what happened to them.
$ diff -u u-boot.img u-boot.img.backup
Binary files u-boot.img and u-boot.img.backup differ
$ fdtdump u-boot.img
=> u-boot and dt are embedded.
$ fdtdump u-boot.img.backup
=> u-boot and dt are appended after the
FIT structure
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list