[PATCH v3 01/38] spl: Use CONFIG_SPL... instead of CONFIG_..._SPL_...

[Felix Brack]

Hi Simon,

On 24.09.23 21:24, Simon Glass wrote:
> We like to put the SPL first so it is clear that it relates to SPL. Rename
> various malloc-related options which have crept in, to stick to this
> convention.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler at toradex.com>
> Reviewed-by: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch at collabora.com>
> Reviewed-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95 at gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> (no changes since v1)
> .....

I just tried to apply the patch to master for testing and got the
following result:

error: patch failed: configs/am335x_baltos_defconfig:18
error: configs/am335x_baltos_defconfig: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: configs/am335x_igep003x_defconfig:20
error: configs/am335x_igep003x_defconfig: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: configs/dh_imx6_defconfig:39
error: configs/dh_imx6_defconfig: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: configs/starfive_visionfive2_defconfig:47
error: configs/starfive_visionfive2_defconfig: patch does not apply

For what I want to test (changes for PDU001 board) this doesn't matter
however. I'm just not sure: should I go ahead with testing or wait for
an updated patch?

regards Felix