[PATCH v3 4/7] rng: stm32: add RNG clock frequency restraint
Patrice CHOTARD
patrice.chotard at foss.st.com
Wed Sep 27 09:26:32 CEST 2023
On 9/27/23 08:56, Patrice CHOTARD wrote:
>
>
> On 9/19/23 17:27, Gatien Chevallier wrote:
>> In order to ensure a good RNG quality and compatibility with
>> certified RNG configuration, add RNG clock frequency restraint.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier at foss.st.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay at foss.st.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in V2:
>> - Added Patrick's tag
>>
>> drivers/rng/stm32_rng.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rng/stm32_rng.c b/drivers/rng/stm32_rng.c
>> index ada5d92214..f943acd7d2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rng/stm32_rng.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rng/stm32_rng.c
>> @@ -18,10 +18,11 @@
>> #include <linux/iopoll.h>
>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>
>> -#define RNG_CR 0x00
>> -#define RNG_CR_RNGEN BIT(2)
>> -#define RNG_CR_CED BIT(5)
>> -#define RNG_CR_CONDRST BIT(30)
>> +#define RNG_CR 0x00
>> +#define RNG_CR_RNGEN BIT(2)
>> +#define RNG_CR_CED BIT(5)
>> +#define RNG_CR_CLKDIV_SHIFT 16
>> +#define RNG_CR_CONDRST BIT(30)
>>
>> #define RNG_SR 0x04
>> #define RNG_SR_SEIS BIT(6)
>> @@ -31,7 +32,15 @@
>>
>> #define RNG_DR 0x08
>>
>> +/*
>> + * struct stm32_rng_data - RNG compat data
>> + *
>> + * @max_clock_rate: Max RNG clock frequency, in Hertz
>> + * @has_cond_reset: True if conditionnal reset is supported
>> + *
>> + */
>> struct stm32_rng_data {
>> + uint max_clock_rate;
>> bool has_cond_reset;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -87,6 +96,26 @@ static int stm32_rng_read(struct udevice *dev, void *data, size_t len)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static uint stm32_rng_clock_freq_restrain(struct stm32_rng_plat *pdata)
>> +{
>> + ulong clock_rate = 0;
>> + uint clock_div = 0;
>> +
>> + clock_rate = clk_get_rate(&pdata->clk);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Get the exponent to apply on the CLKDIV field in RNG_CR register.
>> + * No need to handle the case when clock-div > 0xF as it is physically
>> + * impossible.
>> + */
>> + while ((clock_rate >> clock_div) > pdata->data->max_clock_rate)
>> + clock_div++;
>> +
>> + log_debug("RNG clk rate : %lu\n", clk_get_rate(&pdata->clk) >> clock_div);
>> +
>> + return clock_div;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int stm32_rng_init(struct stm32_rng_plat *pdata)
>> {
>> int err;
>> @@ -99,7 +128,9 @@ static int stm32_rng_init(struct stm32_rng_plat *pdata)
>> cr = readl(pdata->base + RNG_CR);
>>
>> if (pdata->data->has_cond_reset) {
>> - cr |= RNG_CR_CONDRST;
>> + uint clock_div = stm32_rng_clock_freq_restrain(pdata);
>> +
>> + cr |= RNG_CR_CONDRST | (clock_div << RNG_CR_CLKDIV_SHIFT);
>> if (pdata->ced)
>> cr &= ~RNG_CR_CED;
>> else
>> @@ -186,10 +217,12 @@ static const struct dm_rng_ops stm32_rng_ops = {
>>
>> static const struct stm32_rng_data stm32mp13_rng_data = {
>> .has_cond_reset = true,
>> + .max_clock_rate = 48000000,
>> };
>>
>> static const struct stm32_rng_data stm32_rng_data = {
>> .has_cond_reset = false,
>> + .max_clock_rate = 3000000,
>> };
>>
>> static const struct udevice_id stm32_rng_match[] = {
>
> Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard at foss.st.com>
>
> Thanks
> Patrice
Apply on stm32/next
Patrice
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list