[PATCH v2 1/1] disk: add TegraPT support

[Tom Rini]

On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 08:29:57AM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:

> сб, 10 серп. 2024 р. о 01:02 Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> пише:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 08:57:03AM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> > > пт, 9 серп. 2024 р. о 08:49 Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk at gmx.de> пише:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Am 7. August 2024 14:10:24 MESZ schrieb Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95 at gmail.com>:
> > > > >TegraPT is compatible with EFI part but it can't pass Protective MBR check.
> > > > >Skip this check if CONFIG_TEGRA_PARTITION is enabled, storage uclass is MMC
> > > > >and devnum is 0. Note, eMMC on supported devices MUST be aliased to mmc0.
> > > >
> > > > Why wouldn't you use U-Boot's gpt command to fix the non-conformant partition table?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I would love to, but I am forced to use TegraPT and DON'T modify it.
> > > Tegra114 bootloader is RSA signed and there is no possible way to
> > > replace it with open source one unless vendor allows this. SO I am
> > > stuck with vendor bootloader to chainload from which enforces TegraPT
> > > as well. Modification of existing partition table can irreversibly
> > > brick the device.
> >
> > Can we please incorporate some of this information to the help text, so
> > it's clear what the use case is? Thanks.
> 
> Sure, though usually those who know what they are dealing with will
> understand. BTW, Tom, may I pick patchsets assigned to Thierry (tagr)
> via Tegra custodian tree if they pass? Even if they, apart being
> related to Tegra, belong to different subsystems (like this patch and,
> for example, tegra gpio driver changes).

Yes, that's fine.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20240812/86ba7315/attachment.sig>