[PATCH 0/6] bootstd: sunxi: Migrate to standard boot
Andre Przywara
andre.przywara at arm.com
Tue Aug 13 14:35:16 CEST 2024
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 06:17:17 -0600
Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
Hi Simon,
I had a bit deeper look yesterday.
> Hi Andre,
>
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 at 10:00, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 14:50:26 -0600
> > Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Simon,
> >
> > > This series attempts to migrate all sunxi boards to use standard boot,
> > > along with a text environment.
> >
> > Ah, many thanks for that! I figured that we need a bootmeth for FEL, but
> > never got around to have a closer look.
> > On a coarse glance, this looks roughly OK, and doing a super quick boot
> > test on one board, it seems to still work(TM), though the priority of the
> > FEL boot is not right?
>
> Does it need to be the top priority, perhaps?
Yes, please. It should only trigger when you a) do FEL booting and b)
upload a boot script via FEL, in which case you surely want to execute
that before anything else. From what I see the global EFI bootmeth is first
in the list, but I couldn't find an easy way to fix this in the source
file. Would that go through a platform specific bootmeths env variable?
> > And I guess ditching the old kernel support might be a bit controversial.
> > I think this is about the vendor kernels, which some people still rely on?
>
> OK, perhaps it is. It might be a little tricky to handle it, but I
> suspect another bootmeth might be enough.
Well, I had a look, and it looks like CONFIG_OLD_SUNXI_KERNEL_COMPAT
covers multiple things:
- it sets up some clocks slightly differently
- it enters the kernel (stays?) in secure mode
- it provides a custom boot script
I think the latter can be replaced quite easily with something custom, and
I guess it's the only one biting you? So I am OK with that going, but I
think we should keep the first two features (and thus the Kconfig symbol).
Another thing I discovered: we lose USB support with patch 3/6. The reason
is that USB support is enabled by having DISTRO_DEFAULTS. Just replacing
that with BOOTSTD_DEFAULTS didn't work, though, I get a (ridiculous) splat
about a circular Kconfig dependency. My hunch is that's something else not
right in Kconfig, but I need to have a closer look.
Cheers,
Andre
>
> >
> > I will have a closer look this week and give you a review, just wanted to
> > acknowledge the series and thank you for your efforts.
>
> OK thank you.
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Andre
> >
> > > Simon Glass (6):
> > > sunxi: Drop BOOTCMD_SUNXI_COMPAT
> > > sunxi: Add a bootmeth for FEL
> > > sunxi: Move to bootstd
> > > sunxi: Drop old distro boot variables
> > > env: Provide a work-around for unquoting fdtfile
> > > sunxi: Move to text environment
> > >
> > > Makefile | 1 +
> > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/clock_sun4i.h | 10 -
> > > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig | 12 -
> > > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/dram_sun4i.c | 4 -
> > > board/sunxi/sunxi.env | 138 ++++++++++
> > > boot/Kconfig | 14 ++
> > > boot/Makefile | 1 +
> > > boot/bootmeth_fel.c | 81 ++++++
> > > configs/icnova-a20-swac_defconfig | 1 -
> > > doc/usage/environment.rst | 12 +
> > > include/configs/sunxi-common.h | 238 ------------------
> > > 12 files changed, 248 insertions(+), 266 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 board/sunxi/sunxi.env
> > > create mode 100644 boot/bootmeth_fel.c
> > >
> >
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list