[PATCH v9 35/37] [TESTING] Kconfig: enable NET_LWIP by default except for SANDBOX
Ilias Apalodimas
ilias.apalodimas at linaro.org
Fri Aug 30 11:27:21 CEST 2024
Hi Simon,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 at 03:59, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Jerome,
>
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 at 10:21, Jerome Forissier
> <jerome.forissier at linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/29/24 16:05, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Jerome,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 at 07:50, Jerome Forissier
> > > <jerome.forissier at linaro.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Enable NET_LWIP by default for testing purposes. SANDBOX doesn't support
> > >> NET_LWIP so default to NET in this case.
> > >
> > > Sandbox needs to support NET_LWIP.
> >
> > I agree in principle, but AFAICT it is not a trivial task. Does it have to
> > be done in this series or can it be dealt with later?
>
> Does it build OK with sandbox? We use it for almost all of our feature
> development and testing, so I cannot imagine bringing this in if it
> doesn't work. How did you develop this feature?
sandbox is deeply rooted into the old network stack. It fakes ACK
responses, handles the ping request/replies with the sandbox ethernet
driver etc. I was looking on adding LWIP support for it, but it's not
trivial and I don't want us to add another hacky 'glue layer'. Since
LWIP is a big feature on its own -- and is working on real hardware
and QEMU, we discussed adding it, so people can test and contribute
fixes while we fix sandbox.
>
> >
> > I would need to look into this more closely to give details, but if I
> > remember correctly the sandbox tests expect a precise sequence of network
> > packets. For example when doing a TFTP tests, it expects an ARP packet to
> > go out first, but when lwIP is used the ARP might not go out because the IP
> > may already be in the cache. So the sandbox is definitely not a black box
> > in that respect which makes things a bit more difficult.
>
> The key thing is to have a way to reset the state. So long as you have
> that, you should be able to put networking back to the initial state
> before running a test.
Thanks
/Ilias
>
> Regards,
> Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list