[PATCH v2 1/2] board: rockchip: Add support for rk3588s based Cool Pi 4B

[Andy Yan]

Hi Quentin：
At 2024-02-15 18:40:25, "Quentin Schulz" <quentin.schulz at theobroma-systems.com> wrote:
>Hi Andy,
>
>On 2/15/24 11:35, Andy Yan wrote:
>[...]
>>>> diff --git a/configs/coolpi-4b-rk3588s_defconfig b/configs/coolpi-4b-rk3588s_defconfig
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000000..3e3e5abc86
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/configs/coolpi-4b-rk3588s_defconfig
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
>>>> +CONFIG_ARM=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT=y
>>>> +CONFIG_COUNTER_FREQUENCY=24000000
>>>> +CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP=y
>>>> +CONFIG_TEXT_BASE=0x00a00000
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_LIBGENERIC_SUPPORT=y
>>>> +CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS=2
>>>> +CONFIG_HAS_CUSTOM_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR=y
>>>> +CONFIG_CUSTOM_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR=0xc00000
>>>> +CONFIG_SF_DEFAULT_SPEED=24000000
>>>> +CONFIG_SF_DEFAULT_MODE=0x2000
>>>> +CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="rk3588s-coolpi-4b"
>>>> +CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_RK3588=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_ROCKCHIP_COMMON_BOARD=y
>>>> +CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_SPI_IMAGE=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_SERIAL=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_ADDR=0x600000
>>>> +CONFIG_TARGET_EVB_RK3588=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_STACK=0x400000
>>>> +CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_BASE=0xFEB50000
>>>> +CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_CLOCK=24000000
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_SPI_FLASH_SUPPORT=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_SPI=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SYS_LOAD_ADDR=0xc00800
>>>> +CONFIG_PCI=y
>>>> +CONFIG_DEBUG_UART=y
>>>> +CONFIG_AHCI=y
>>>> +CONFIG_FIT=y
>>>> +CONFIG_FIT_VERBOSE=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_LOAD_FIT=y
>>>> +CONFIG_LEGACY_IMAGE_FORMAT=y
>>>> +CONFIG_OF_BOARD_SETUP=y
>>>> +CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE="rockchip/rk3588s-coolpi-4b.dtb"
>>>> +# CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is not set
>>>> +CONFIG_DISPLAY_BOARDINFO_LATE=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE=0x40000
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO=0x7f8000
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_HAS_BSS_LINKER_SECTION=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_BSS_START_ADDR=0x4000000
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_BSS_MAX_SIZE=0x4000
>>>> +# CONFIG_SPL_RAW_IMAGE_SUPPORT is not set
>>>> +# CONFIG_SPL_SHARES_INIT_SP_ADDR is not set
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_SPI_LOAD=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SYS_SPI_U_BOOT_OFFS=0x60000
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_ATF=y
>>>> +CONFIG_CMD_GPIO=y
>>>> +CONFIG_CMD_GPT=y
>>>> +CONFIG_CMD_I2C=y
>>>> +CONFIG_CMD_MMC=y
>>>> +CONFIG_CMD_PCI=y
>>>> +CONFIG_CMD_USB=y
>>>> +# CONFIG_CMD_SETEXPR is not set
>>>> +CONFIG_CMD_REGULATOR=y
>>>> +# CONFIG_SPL_DOS_PARTITION is not set
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_OF_CONTROL=y
>>>> +CONFIG_OF_LIVE=y
>>>> +CONFIG_OF_SPL_REMOVE_PROPS="clock-names interrupt-parent assigned-clocks assigned-clock-rates assigned-clock-parents"
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_DM_SEQ_ALIAS=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_REGMAP=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_SYSCON=y
>>>> +CONFIG_AHCI_PCI=y
>>>> +CONFIG_DWC_AHCI=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_CLK=y
>>>> +CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_GPIO=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SYS_I2C_ROCKCHIP=y
>>>> +CONFIG_MISC=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SUPPORT_EMMC_RPMB=y
>>>> +CONFIG_MMC_DW=y
>>>> +CONFIG_MMC_DW_ROCKCHIP=y
>>>> +CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI=y
>>>> +CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_SDMA=y
>>>> +CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_ROCKCHIP=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SF_DEFAULT_BUS=5
>>>> +CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_SFDP_SUPPORT=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_XMC=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_XTX=y
>>>> +CONFIG_PHY_MOTORCOMM=y
>>>> +CONFIG_DWC_ETH_QOS=y
>>>> +CONFIG_DWC_ETH_QOS_ROCKCHIP=y
>>>> +CONFIG_NVME_PCI=y
>>>> +CONFIG_PCIE_DW_ROCKCHIP=y
>>>> +CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_INNO_USB2=y
>>>> +CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_NANENG_COMBOPHY=y
>>>> +CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_USBDP=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_PINCTRL=y
>>>> +CONFIG_PWM_ROCKCHIP=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_RAM=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SCSI=y
>>>> +CONFIG_BAUDRATE=1500000
>>>> +CONFIG_DEBUG_UART_SHIFT=2
>>>> +CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_MEM32=y
>>>> +CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_SFC=y
>>>> +CONFIG_SYSRESET=y
>>>> +CONFIG_USB=y
>>>> +CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>> +CONFIG_USB_EHCI_HCD=y
>>>> +CONFIG_USB_EHCI_GENERIC=y
>>>> +CONFIG_USB_OHCI_HCD=y
>>>> +CONFIG_USB_OHCI_GENERIC=y
>>>> +CONFIG_USB_DWC3=y
>>>> +CONFIG_USB_DWC3_GENERIC=y
>>>> +CONFIG_ERRNO_STR=y
>>>
>>> Is there any reason for NOT enabling MMC_HS400_ES?
>> 
>> No, I just follow the config of other rk3588/s based boards.
>
>Fortunately enough, a patch was recently merged to have at least HS200 
>on RK3588, which is the first mode that actually works, anything below 
>that is broken right now.
>
>> It seems that there are no rk3588/s based boards enable MMC_HS400_ES in the current u-boot mainline ?
>> 
>
>Jaguar is hopefully coming soon-ish, maybe not in this release but the 
>next one (patches are sent already), and we make us of it in U-Boot 
>proper and the SPL. Up to you, can always be enabled later on.

With a quick search， I fond jonas'S patch for enabling HS200 has been merged, but
your patch will bring HS400_ES, does that mean all the rk3588/s based boars will switch to
HS400 ES if they support it?

Thanks.
>
>FWIW, both comments on this patch also apply to the second patch in this 
>series :)
>
>Cheers,
>Quentin