[PATCH v2 2/8] reset: imx: Add support for i.MX8MP reset controller
Sumit Garg
sumit.garg at linaro.org
Mon Feb 26 14:03:14 CET 2024
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 16:26, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>
> On 2/26/24 11:43 AM, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 14:24, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/26/24 9:04 AM, Sumit Garg wrote:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>> +static int imx7_reset_assert_imx8mp(struct reset_ctl *rst)
> >>
> >> Linux calls those imx8mp_reset_set() can co. which is less confusing
> >> than imx7...imx8mp() , use it.
> >>
> >
> > IMO, it would be more confusing if we choose two different naming
> > patterns for the same driver, see existing function names
> > imx7_reset_{deassert/assert}_imx* pattern.
>
> Maybe create a patch which updates the naming scheme ?
I can do that as a preparatory patch.
>
> Using two SoC names in one function name is confusing I think .
>
> >> In fact, why not copy the code from Linux outright ?
> >
> > I suppose the question here is to not convert the driver to use
> > regmap, right? If it is then that should be done as a separate cleanup
> > patch.
>
> If it isn't too hard, please do the clean up first and then add the
> MX8MP bits on top.
The coding part is easy but it is rather the testing part which I am
worried about as I don't have access to all the platforms which rely
on this driver.
-Sumit
>
> [...]
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list