[PATCH v5] misc: fs-loader: Use fw_storage_interface instead of storage_interface
Roger Quadros
rogerq at kernel.org
Wed Feb 28 10:45:35 CET 2024
On 28/02/2024 11:02, MD Danish Anwar wrote:
>
> On 27/02/24 7:33 pm, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> Hi Danish,
>>
>> On 2/27/24 05:26, MD Danish Anwar wrote:
>>> On 09/02/24 3:38 pm, MD Danish Anwar wrote:
>>>> The fs-loader driver reads env storage_interface and uses it to load
>>>> firmware file into memory using the medium set by env. Update the driver
>>>> to use env fw_storage_interface as this variable is only used to load
>>>> firmwares. This is to keep all variables used by fs-loader driver with
>>>> 'fw_' prefix. All other variables have 'fw_' prefix except for
>>>> storage_interface.
>>>>
>>>> The env storage_interface will act as fallback so that the
>>>> existing implementations do not break.
>>>>
>>>> Also update the FS Loader documentation accordingly.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar at ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Hi Tom / Sean, can you please pick this patch if there is no pending
>>> comments to address.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, I forgot to respond to this earlier.
>>
>> To be honest, I'm not really convinced. We have plenty of environmental
>> variables which are inconsistent (e.g. ethaddr, eth2addr, eth3addr) and it
>> doesn't cause any issues. While fixing code has no cost, the environment
>> is an ABI which we can't break. So we'd have to support both of these
>> variables forever. I'm not really a fan of doing that without good reason,
>> and I think aesthetics of the variable name isn't really compelling.
>>
>
> Roger, should I keep the env variable name as it is and don't rename it?
> Sean's concern seems valid, can you please comment here.
Sure.
--
cheers,
-roger
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list