[PATCH] cmd: sf: Fix sf probe crash

Michal Simek michal.simek at amd.com
Thu Jan 4 13:21:01 CET 2024



On 1/4/24 13:15, Weizhao Ouyang wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 8:00 PM Michal Simek <michal.simek at amd.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/4/24 12:46, Weizhao Ouyang wrote:
>>> Handle the return value of spi_flash_probe_bus_cs() to avoid sf probe
>>> crashes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Weizhao Ouyang <o451686892 at gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>    cmd/sf.c | 5 +++--
>>>    1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/cmd/sf.c b/cmd/sf.c
>>> index 730996c02b..e3866899f6 100644
>>> --- a/cmd/sf.c
>>> +++ b/cmd/sf.c
>>> @@ -135,8 +135,9 @@ static int do_spi_flash_probe(int argc, char *const argv[])
>>>        }
>>>        flash = NULL;
>>>        if (use_dt) {
>>> -             spi_flash_probe_bus_cs(bus, cs, &new);
>>> -             flash = dev_get_uclass_priv(new);
>>> +             ret = spi_flash_probe_bus_cs(bus, cs, &new);
>>
>> if (ret)
>>          return ret;
>>
>> don't you want to rather propagate that error?
>>
> 
> Well, since the spi_flash is empty, the following code will
> print the error message and return.

And you return 0 which means everything is fine. But is everything fine in this 
case? Or do you want to see the error?

This is command it means you can simply use && and if previous command succeed 
you can call something else.

Thanks,
Michal




More information about the U-Boot mailing list