[PATCH v7 15/17] configs: Add am69_sk_* defconfig fragments
Manorit Chawdhry
m-chawdhry at ti.com
Thu Jan 11 10:36:30 CET 2024
Hi Nishanth,
On 11:59-20240103, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 00:45-20231220, Apurva Nandan wrote:
> > From: Dasnavis Sabiya <sabiya.d at ti.com>
> >
> > Add config fragments for am69_sk A72 and R5 configuration.
> >
> > This applies on to:
> > j784s4_evm_a72_defconfig -> am69_sk_a72.config
> > j784s4_evm_r5_defconfig -> am69_sk_r5.config
> >
> > The usage model (with the fragment) would be:
> > make j784s4_evm_a72_defconfig am69_sk_a72.config
> > make
> >
> > OR
> >
> > make j784s4_evm_r5_defconfig am69_sk_r5.config
> > make
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dasnavis Sabiya <sabiya.d at ti.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Apurva Nandan <a-nandan at ti.com>
> > ---
> > configs/am69_sk_a72.config | 3 +++
> > configs/am69_sk_r5.config | 3 +++
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 configs/am69_sk_a72.config
> > create mode 100644 configs/am69_sk_r5.config
> >
> > diff --git a/configs/am69_sk_a72.config b/configs/am69_sk_a72.config
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..5668e23b37
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/configs/am69_sk_a72.config
> > @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
> > +# Defconfig fragment to apply on top of j784s4_evm_a72_defconfig
> > +
> > +CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="k3-am69-sk"
> > diff --git a/configs/am69_sk_r5.config b/configs/am69_sk_r5.config
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..9194694393
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/configs/am69_sk_r5.config
> > @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
> > +# Defconfig fragment to apply on top of j784s4_evm_r5_defconfig
> > +
> > +CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="k3-am69-r5-sk"
>
> See my previous comment. OF_LIST should have been overriden here to just
> a single dtb.
Just to get an understanding with this change, so from what I see is
OF_LIST is used to package multiple DTBs in u-boot but they way binman
is made, we don't have dtb generator nodes that will pack them
automatically. Even if that is the case from what I understand is the
u-boot.dtb that gets generated is based on CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE so
how would we know which one is the default? Or are we saying that we'll
override OF_LIST and always use only one DTB for packing in U-boot.
The reason am asking this is because with FIT Signature, we embed a
signature node as well in the u-boot.dtb and not knowing which one is
the default and having multiple DTBs packed in U-boot have always been
problematic with this flow. ( In the past based on
CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE value we have ended up packing the same DTB
twice. )
We use u-boot.dtb as a base reference and after adding the signature
node to it we pack it back in u-boot with EXT_DTB flag in u-boot which
gets propagated to u-boot.dtb (essentially only one DTB we can pack in
this way which has the signed node), so essentially if we use OF_LIST
and end up packing multiple DTBs I don't want use to have a conflicting
dtb actually getting packed in some other DTBs place..
Regards,
Manorit
>
> --
> Regards,
> Nishanth Menon
> Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list