[RFC v2 0/2] FIT documentation link vs copy

Sam Povilus sam.povilus at amd.com
Tue Jul 2 03:14:38 CEST 2024


I'm proposing linking the FIT documentation instead of double book keeping it, 
it does have the disadvantage of making it more difficult to see the 
documentation especially if offline. 

v2: update table of contents instead of removing

Sam Povilus (2):
  doc: Remove FIT documentation that is elsewhere
  doc: add missing table of content links

 doc/usage/fit/index.rst              |  25 +-
 doc/usage/fit/source_file_format.rst | 682 +--------------------------
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 682 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1



More information about the U-Boot mailing list