[RFC v2 0/2] FIT documentation link vs copy
Sam Povilus
sam.povilus at amd.com
Tue Jul 2 03:14:38 CEST 2024
I'm proposing linking the FIT documentation instead of double book keeping it,
it does have the disadvantage of making it more difficult to see the
documentation especially if offline.
v2: update table of contents instead of removing
Sam Povilus (2):
doc: Remove FIT documentation that is elsewhere
doc: add missing table of content links
doc/usage/fit/index.rst | 25 +-
doc/usage/fit/source_file_format.rst | 682 +--------------------------
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 682 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list