[PATCH 1/2] spi: soft_spi: fix miso gpio property name

[Mikhail Kshevetskiy]

On 27.06.2024 14:34, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> [You don't often get email from festevam at gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 8:31 AM Mikhail Kshevetskiy
> <mikhail.kshevetskiy at iopsys.eu> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Kshevetskiy <mikhail.kshevetskiy at iopsys.eu>
>> ---
>>  drivers/spi/soft_spi.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/soft_spi.c b/drivers/spi/soft_spi.c
>> index 0fa14339bdc..3fe62818a44 100644
>> --- a/drivers/spi/soft_spi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/spi/soft_spi.c
>> @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static int soft_spi_probe(struct udevice *dev)
>>         ret = gpio_request_by_name(dev, "gpio-miso", 0, &plat->miso,
>>                                    GPIOD_IS_IN);
>>         if (ret)
>> -               ret = gpio_request_by_name(dev, "gpio-miso", 0, &plat->miso,
>> +               ret = gpio_request_by_name(dev, "miso-gpios", 0, &plat->miso,
> We should support the deprecated 'gpio-miso' property and the
> preferred 'miso-gpios' one.
>
> The same applies for  gpio-sck and gpio-mosi.

This is exactly what the patch did. Actually it just fix a miss-print.
Other properties already have a proper fallback.

>>                                            GPIOD_IS_IN);
>>         if (ret)
>>                 plat->flags |= SPI_MASTER_NO_RX;
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>