[PATCH v3 08/19] test: Introduce the concept of a role
Tom Rini
trini at konsulko.com
Mon Jul 15 23:03:13 CEST 2024
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 08:11:28AM +0100, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 at 17:57, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 04:13:55PM +0100, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 at 00:12, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 09:37:18AM +0100, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > > Hi Tom,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 at 15:29, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 09:00:33AM +0100, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi Tom,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 at 15:27, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 01:38:08PM +0100, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Hi Tom,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 19:13, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 02:32:02PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > In Labgrid there is the concept of a 'role', which is similar to the
> > > > > > > > > > > U-Boot board ID in U-Boot's pytest subsystem.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The role indicates both the target and information about the U-Boot
> > > > > > > > > > > build to use. It can also provide any amount of other configuration.
> > > > > > > > > > > The information is obtained using the 'labgrid-client query' operation.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Make use of this in tests, so that only the role is required in gitlab
> > > > > > > > > > > and other situations. The board type and other things can be queried
> > > > > > > > > > > as needed.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Use a new 'u-boot-test-getrole' script to obtain the requested
> > > > > > > > > > > information.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > With this it is possible to run lab tests in gitlab with just a single
> > > > > > > > > > > 'ROLE' variable for each board.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > (no changes since v1)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > test/py/conftest.py | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > > > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/test/py/conftest.py b/test/py/conftest.py
> > > > > > > > > > > index 6547c6922c6..5de8d7b0e23 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > --- a/test/py/conftest.py
> > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/test/py/conftest.py
> > > > > > > > > > > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ from pathlib import Path
> > > > > > > > > > > import pytest
> > > > > > > > > > > import re
> > > > > > > > > > > from _pytest.runner import runtestprotocol
> > > > > > > > > > > +import subprocess
> > > > > > > > > > > import sys
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > # Globals: The HTML log file, and the connection to the U-Boot console.
> > > > > > > > > > > @@ -79,6 +80,7 @@ def pytest_addoption(parser):
> > > > > > > > > > > parser.addoption('--gdbserver', default=None,
> > > > > > > > > > > help='Run sandbox under gdbserver. The argument is the channel '+
> > > > > > > > > > > 'over which gdbserver should communicate, e.g. localhost:1234')
> > > > > > > > > > > + parser.addoption('--role', help='U-Boot board role (for Labgrid)')
> > > > > > > > > > > parser.addoption('--no-prompt-wait', default=False, action='store_true',
> > > > > > > > > > > help="Assume that U-Boot is ready and don't wait for a prompt")
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > @@ -130,12 +132,33 @@ def get_details(config):
> > > > > > > > > > > str: Build directory
> > > > > > > > > > > str: Source directory
> > > > > > > > > > > """
> > > > > > > > > > > - board_type = config.getoption('board_type')
> > > > > > > > > > > - board_identity = config.getoption('board_identity')
> > > > > > > > > > > + role = config.getoption('role')
> > > > > > > > > > > build_dir = config.getoption('build_dir')
> > > > > > > > > > > + if role:
> > > > > > > > > > > + board_identity = role
> > > > > > > > > > > + cmd = ['u-boot-test-getrole', role, '--configure']
> > > > > > > > > > > + env = os.environ.copy()
> > > > > > > > > > > + if build_dir:
> > > > > > > > > > > + env['U_BOOT_BUILD_DIR'] = build_dir
> > > > > > > > > > > + proc = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, encoding='utf-8',
> > > > > > > > > > > + env=env)
> > > > > > > > > > > + if proc.returncode:
> > > > > > > > > > > + raise ValueError(proc.stderr)
> > > > > > > > > > > + print('conftest: lab:', proc.stdout)
> > > > > > > > > > > + vals = {}
> > > > > > > > > > > + for line in proc.stdout.splitlines():
> > > > > > > > > > > + item, value = line.split(' ', maxsplit=1)
> > > > > > > > > > > + k = item.split(':')[-1]
> > > > > > > > > > > + vals[k] = value
> > > > > > > > > > > + print('conftest: lab info:', vals)
> > > > > > > > > > > + board_type, default_build_dir, source_dir = (vals['board'],
> > > > > > > > > > > + vals['build_dir'], vals['source_dir'])
> > > > > > > > > > > + else:
> > > > > > > > > > > + board_type = config.getoption('board_type')
> > > > > > > > > > > + board_identity = config.getoption('board_identity')
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > - source_dir = os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(TEST_PY_DIR))
> > > > > > > > > > > - default_build_dir = source_dir + '/build-' + board_type
> > > > > > > > > > > + source_dir = os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(TEST_PY_DIR))
> > > > > > > > > > > + default_build_dir = source_dir + '/build-' + board_type
> > > > > > > > > > > if not build_dir:
> > > > > > > > > > > build_dir = default_build_dir
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'm a little confused here. Why can't we construct "role" from
> > > > > > > > > > board_type+board_identity and then we have the board
> > > > > > > > > > conf.${board_type}_${board_identity} file set whatever needs setting to
> > > > > > > > > > be "labgrid" ?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The role is equivalent to the board identity, not the combination of
> > > > > > > > > the U-Boot board type and the board identity. I went this way to avoid
> > > > > > > > > having to type long and complicated roles when connecting to boards.
> > > > > > > > > It is similar to how things work today, except that the board type is
> > > > > > > > > implied by the 'role'.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > For boards which have multiple identities (e.g. can support two
> > > > > > > > > different board types), Labgrid handles acquiring and releasing the
> > > > > > > > > shares resources, to avoid any problems.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I guess I have two sets of questions. First, if it's basically the
> > > > > > > > board identity why can't we just use that as the role name, in your
> > > > > > > > setup?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes, that's what I am doing. If you look in console.labgrid you can
> > > > > > > see that it is passing U_BOOT_BOARD_IDENTITY as the -r argument.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Then why do we need this?
> > > > >
> > > > > We need to pass a role to Labgrid, since it determines the board
> > > > > identity to use. It also (indirectly) determines the U-Boot build to
> > > > > use, since each board identity / role is a particular board with a
> > > > > particular build.
> > > >
> > > > Oh, I get where you're coming from now at least. But this still sounds
> > > > like a detail to put in to the conf.${board}_${board_type} file and not
> > > > a thing to set here?
> > >
> > > There are no such files with the Labgrid integration so far. They are
> > > not needed.
> >
> > They're needed in my case since I do not (cannot) use buildman to then
> > kick off the tests.
>
> OK...is your environment upstream so I can compare with mine?
The engineer here that was working on it is unfortunately leaving
shortly and I forget if he got everything labgrid related posted. The
other half of the environment is that none of my tests treat the hooks
repository any different than before. And note that when I say cannot
above I mean that because:
1) All of the TI platforms that require an Cortex-R and Cortex-A builds.
You can (nominally) stick with only upgrading one part at a time, and so
just test an even smaller subset on the R core, and once that passes,
test the subset of tests that run on HW on the A core.
2) Enable further options. I enable CMD_BOOTMENU, CMD_LOG globally,
CMD_TFTPPUT and FIT+FIT_SIGNATURE globally and BOOTSTAGE (+ stash) on
Pi, and I'm going to cover TI K3 platforms next (since they too can
easily share a stash addr).
The latter could be solved if buildman had some native config-fragment
support and we didn't have the #include games we have today. No, I don't
have a good idea on solving that either, only noting that today I use
scripts/kconfig/merge_config.sh to combine defconfig + the above.
> > [snip]
> > > > > Basically, as I understand it, the 'role' is the thing we want.
> > > > >
> > > > > Labgrid environment:
> > > > >
> > > > > samus:
> > > > > resources:
> > > > > RemotePlace:
> > > > > name: samus
> > > > > ...
> > > > > UBootProviderDriver:
> > > > > board: chromebook_samus
> > > > > binman_indir: /vid/software/devel/samus/bin
> > > > >
> > > > > samus_tpl:
> > > > > resources:
> > > > > RemotePlace:
> > > > > name: samus
> > > > > UBootProviderDriver:
> > > > > board: chromebook_samus_tpl
> > > > > binman_indir: /vid/software/devel/samus/bin
> > > >
> > > > I guess the problem here is that from my point of view, this can live in
> > > > the u-boot-test-hooks/bin/<host>/conf.<machine> file since we're never
> > > > going to worry about building U-Boot (even if blobs aren't a problem, we
> > > > want to enable more features to test more things on HW) but from your
> > > > point of view, buildman must provide test.py with the correct build so
> > > > we need to know things prior.
> > >
> > > Well, either you already have a build to test, iwc it is fine, or if
> > > you don't you can pass --build to force a build, or rely on Labgrid to
> > > initiate the build.
> >
> > No, neither buildman nor labgrid can initiate a functional build. Have
> > you integrated the beagleplay in to your lab? That I believe
> > demonstrates one of the problems (you need to build both
> > am62x_beagleplay_a53 and am62x_beagleplay_r5 and write files from both,
> > to test a given rev on the platform).
>
> Actually I was about to do that. Will get back to it in a few weeks.
> Labgrid can initiate two builds and copy files from both.
I'm very interested in what this all looks like once that works too.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20240715/a50d9258/attachment.sig>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list