[PATCH 16/40] lmb: allow lmb module to be used in SPL

[Simon Glass]

Hi Sughosh,

On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:04, Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> With the introduction of separate config symbols for the SPL phase of
> U-Boot, the condition checks need to be tweaked so that platforms that
> enable the LMB module in SPL are also able to call the LMB API's. Use
> the appropriate condition checks to achieve this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu at linaro.org>
> ---
> Changes since rfc:
> * Replace conditional compilation of lmb code to an if
>   (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED()) in store_block() and tftp_init_load_addr().
>
>  board/xilinx/common/board.c |  2 +-
>  boot/bootm.c                |  4 ++--
>  boot/image-board.c          |  2 +-
>  fs/fs.c                     |  4 ++--
>  lib/Makefile                |  2 +-
>  net/tftp.c                  | 40 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  net/wget.c                  |  4 ++--
>  7 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

Same question as previous patch...do any platforms need lmb in SPL?

The cover letter says "The LMB module is enabled by default for the
main U-Boot image, while it needs to be enabled for SPL." but I don't
really understand that.

Regards,
Simon