[PATCH 23/40] lmb: add a flags parameter to the API's

[Simon Glass]

Hi Sughosh,

On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:04, Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Add a flags parameter to the LMB API functions. The parameter can then
> be used to pass any other type of reservations or allocations needed
> by the callers. These will be used in a subsequent set of changes for
> allocation requests coming from the EFI subsystem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu at linaro.org>
> ---
> Changes since rfc: New patch
>
>  arch/arm/mach-apple/board.c       |  17 ++--
>  arch/arm/mach-snapdragon/board.c  |   2 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/dram_init.c |   4 +-
>  arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/mp.c     |   2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/lib/bootm.c          |   2 +-
>  board/xilinx/common/board.c       |   4 +-
>  boot/bootm.c                      |   5 +-
>  boot/image-board.c                |  15 ++-
>  boot/image-fdt.c                  |  15 +--
>  cmd/booti.c                       |   2 +-
>  cmd/bootz.c                       |   2 +-
>  cmd/load.c                        |   4 +-
>  drivers/iommu/apple_dart.c        |   6 +-
>  drivers/iommu/sandbox_iommu.c     |   6 +-
>  fs/fs.c                           |   2 +-
>  include/lmb.h                     |  23 ++---
>  lib/lmb.c                         |  48 ++++------
>  test/lib/lmb.c                    | 150 +++++++++++++++---------------
>  18 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 159 deletions(-)

This negates any code-size advantage of dropping the lmb parameter.

All of these are LMB_NONE. Can we have a separate function (e.g.
lmb_alloc_type()) for when we actually need to specify the type?

Regards,
Simon