[PATCH 24/40] lmb: add a common implementation of arch_lmb_reserve()

[Simon Glass]

Hi Sughosh,

On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 00:04, Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Almost all of the current definitions of arch_lmb_reserve() are doing
> the same thing. The only exception in a couple of cases is the
> alignment parameter requirement. Have a generic weak implementation of
> this function, keeping the highest value of alignment that is being
> used(16K).
>
> Also, instead of using the current value of stack pointer for starting
> the reserved region, have a fixed value, considering the stack size
> config value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu at linaro.org>
> ---
> Changes since rfc: None
>
>  arch/arc/lib/cache.c        | 14 --------------
>  arch/arm/lib/stack.c        | 14 --------------
>  arch/m68k/lib/bootm.c       | 17 -----------------
>  arch/microblaze/lib/bootm.c | 14 --------------
>  arch/mips/lib/bootm.c       | 15 ---------------
>  arch/nios2/lib/bootm.c      | 13 -------------
>  arch/powerpc/lib/bootm.c    | 13 +++----------
>  arch/riscv/lib/bootm.c      | 13 -------------
>  arch/sh/lib/bootm.c         | 13 -------------
>  arch/x86/lib/bootm.c        | 18 ------------------
>  arch/xtensa/lib/bootm.c     | 13 -------------
>  lib/lmb.c                   |  6 +++++-
>  12 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)

How about not having a weak function? I have to wonder whether powerpc
really needs to be different? If it does, I suppose we could use an
event to deal with powerpc.

Regards,
Simon