[PATCH v2 03/28] mbedtls: add mbedtls into the build system
Raymond Mao
raymond.mao at linaro.org
Thu May 9 17:23:11 CEST 2024
Hi Tom,
On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 11:11, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 11:04:07AM -0400, Raymond Mao wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 17:16, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 10:50:45AM -0700, Raymond Mao wrote:
> > >
> > > > Port mbedtls with dummy libc header files.
> > > > Add mbedtls default config header file.
> > > > Optimize mbedtls default config by disabling unused features to
> > > > reduce the target size.
> > > > Add mbedtls kbuild makefile.
> > > > Add Kconfig and mbedtls config submenu.
> > > [snip]
> > > > diff --git a/include/stdio.h b/include/stdio.h
> > > > index 3241e2d493f..874279c60dd 100644
> > > > --- a/include/stdio.h
> > > > +++ b/include/stdio.h
> > > > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> > > >
> > > > #include <stdarg.h>
> > > > #include <linux/compiler.h>
> > > > +#include <vsprintf.h>
> > > >
> > > > /* stdin */
> > > > int getchar(void);
> > >
> > > Is this really needed? I know our include structure is a bit odd.
> Should
> > > we perhaps look at moving a prototype or two around to be more broadly
> > > compatible?
> > >
> > Then we need to move prototypes of snprintf, _vprintf, putc_outstr and
> > printf_info from tiny-printf to stdio.h. Is this good for you?
>
> I don't quite follow you but yes, please work it up for review at least
> as I'm not too thrilled with adding <vsprintf.h> to <stdio.h> after the
> work I did removing <common.h> showed some fun around those headers as
> well, and I'd like to sort it out correctly. Thanks.
>
> When MbedTLS native codes include <stdio.h>, they expect to have a
prototype
'snprintf', that is the reason why I hijacked <stdio.h> as we are not going
to
change MbedTLS native codes.
I mean in v3, I can move 'snprintf' related stuff to <stdio.h> so that we
don't
need to include <vsprintf.h>.
Regards,
Raymond
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list