[PATCH 00/10] rockchip: px30: migrate to common bss and stack addresses + UART fixes for evb-px30
Tom Rini
trini at konsulko.com
Tue May 21 20:04:44 CEST 2024
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 07:39:53PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> PX30 Ringneck ran out of memory in the allocation pool of U-Boot proper
> pre-reloc. Something needed to be done. Jonas did migrate a few SoCs
> already to this common bss+stack addresses so it made sense to follow
> the same route for one additional SoC: PX30.
>
> While at it, also fix a few issues related to UART on the PX30 Mini EVB
> I could test.
>
> Boot (to U-Boot CLI) tested on PX30 Ringneck and PX30 Mini-EVB.
>
> Thanks to Jonas for hinting where to look at.
>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz at cherry.de>
> ---
> Quentin Schulz (10):
> rockchip: px30: default TPL_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN to 0x600 on PX30 Kconfig level
> rockchip: Use common bss and stack addresses on PX30
> rockchip: ringneck_px30: Use common bss and stack addresses
> rockchip: evb-px30: Use common bss and stack addresses
> rockchip: firefly-px30: Use common bss and stack addresses
> rockchip: odroid-go2: Use common bss and stack addresses
> rockchip: px30-core-*: Use common bss and stack addresses
> rockchip: px30: make UART pinmux accessible to TPL/SPL DTB
> rockchip: evb-px30: do not remove pinctrl nodes from SPL DTB
> rockchip: evb-px30: make UART5 the debug UART
>
> arch/arm/dts/px30-u-boot.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-rockchip/px30/Kconfig | 8 +++++++-
> configs/evb-px30_defconfig | 23 +++++------------------
> configs/firefly-px30_defconfig | 19 +++----------------
> configs/odroid-go2_defconfig | 19 +++----------------
> configs/px30-core-ctouch2-of10-px30_defconfig | 19 +++----------------
> configs/px30-core-ctouch2-px30_defconfig | 19 +++----------------
> configs/px30-core-edimm2.2-px30_defconfig | 19 +++----------------
> configs/ringneck-px30_defconfig | 19 +++----------------
> 9 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: a7f0154c412859323396111dd0c09dbafbc153cb
> change-id: 20240521-px30-2024-07-rc-7136f6241d29
As I assume we want to fix the platforms for v2024.07, is this the level
of config changes everyone is comfortable with on the platforms? Or
should we just go with the minimum for release and the rest to -next?
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20240521/edd31d2c/attachment.sig>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list