[PATCH] mmc: don't print 'MMC:' if there are no MMC devices

Caleb Connolly caleb.connolly at linaro.org
Wed Nov 13 14:08:56 CET 2024



On 13/11/2024 10:48, Dragan Simic wrote:
> Hello Caleb,
> 
> Thanks for the patch.  Please, see a comment below.
> 
> On 2024-11-13 06:30, Caleb Connolly wrote:
>> It may be the case that MMC support is enabled even though the board
>> we're booting on doesn't have any MMC devices. Move the print over to
>> the print_mmc_devices() function where we can only print it if we
>> actually have MMC devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly at linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  common/board_r.c         | 1 -
>>  drivers/mmc/mmc-uclass.c | 4 +++-
>>  drivers/mmc/mmc_legacy.c | 5 +++++
>>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/common/board_r.c b/common/board_r.c
>> index 62228a723e12..232a8fd19f03 100644
>> --- a/common/board_r.c
>> +++ b/common/board_r.c
>> @@ -384,9 +384,8 @@ static int initr_onenand(void)
>>
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_MMC
>>  static int initr_mmc(void)
>>  {
>> -    puts("MMC:   ");
>>      mmc_initialize(gd->bd);
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>>  #endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/mmc-uclass.c b/drivers/mmc/mmc-uclass.c
>> index c8db4f811c2f..56fe29249c36 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/mmc-uclass.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/mmc-uclass.c
>> @@ -384,9 +384,11 @@ void print_mmc_devices(char separator)
>>           dev;
>>           uclass_next_device(&dev), first = false) {
>>          struct mmc *m = mmc_get_mmc_dev(dev);
>>
>> -        if (!first) {
>> +        if (first) {
>> +            printf("MMC:  ");
>> +        } else {
>>              printf("%c", separator);
>>              if (separator != '\n')
>>                  puts(" ");
>>          }
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/mmc_legacy.c b/drivers/mmc/mmc_legacy.c
>> index 8f8ba34be717..f4a049a4a4d4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/mmc_legacy.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/mmc_legacy.c
>> @@ -98,8 +98,9 @@ void print_mmc_devices(char separator)
>>  {
>>      struct mmc *m;
>>      struct list_head *entry;
>>      char *mmc_type;
>> +    bool first = true;
>>
>>      list_for_each(entry, &mmc_devices) {
>>          m = list_entry(entry, struct mmc, link);
>>
>> @@ -107,8 +108,12 @@ void print_mmc_devices(char separator)
>>              mmc_type = IS_SD(m) ? "SD" : "eMMC";
>>          else
>>              mmc_type = NULL;
>>
>> +        if (first) {
>> +            printf("MMC:  ");
>> +            first = false;
>> +        }
> 
> Can't we simply check for "entry == &mmc_devices->next" here and
> avoid the introduction of "first"?

That would be clever, yeah I can do this in v2.

I hvaen't found a way to test mmc_legacy thus far, does anyone know how
I could?


> 
>>          printf("%s: %d", m->cfg->name, m->block_dev.devnum);
>>          if (mmc_type)
>>              printf(" (%s)", mmc_type);

-- 
// Caleb (they/them)



More information about the U-Boot mailing list