[PATCH v1] imx: Kconfig: make IMX8_ROMAPI configurable

[Peng Fan]

Hi Marek,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] imx: Kconfig: make IMX8_ROMAPI
> configurable
> 
> On 10/6/24 11:23 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 07:31:16AM +0800, alice.guo at oss.nxp.com
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> >>
> >> Make CONFIG_IMX8_ROMAPI could be configured in defconfig.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alice Guo <alice.guo at nxp.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Ye Li <ye.li at nxp.com>
> >> ---
> >>   arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig | 3 ++-
> >>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-
> imx/Kconfig
> >> index 134e42028c..9d3aafd2f8 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
> >> @@ -179,7 +179,8 @@ config DDRMC_VF610_CALIBRATION
> >>   	  the ddrmc_cr_setting on relevant board file.
> >>
> >>   config IMX8_ROMAPI
> >> -	def_bool y
> >> +	bool "Enable i.MX ROMAPI"
> >> +	default y
> >>   	depends on IMX8MN || IMX8MP || IMX8ULP || IMX9
> >
> > Since there's no help here, is this truly configurable, or is this
> > something that should be select'd based on the SoC and presumably
> some
> > of the newer IMX9 parts cannot use this?
> I can imagine the MX95 calls into this custom ELE firmware stuff
> instead of ROMAPI ?

True. i.MX95 A55 code no need ROMAPI.

But it is still good to make this option configurable, because there
is case that people no need romapi.

Regards,
Peng.