[PATCH v1 04/20] arm: socfpga: agilex5: Add low level initialization
Marek Vasut
marex at denx.de
Tue Sep 24 20:32:24 CEST 2024
On 9/24/24 5:14 AM, Chee, Tien Fong wrote:
Hi,
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile
>>> b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile index 67c6a8dfec5..53c91d1d2a5
>> 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile
>>> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ endif
>>>
>>> ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_AGILEX5
>>> obj-y += clock_manager_agilex5.o
>>> +obj-y += lowlevel_init_agilex5.o
>>> obj-y += mailbox_s10.o
>>> obj-y += misc_soc64.o
>>> obj-y += mmu-arm64_s10.o
>> Can this be wired into existing early hook function, like s_init or so ?
>
> I cannot find the caller for s_init, wonder where is the s_init is called?
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/lowlevel_init.S:.pushsection .text.s_init, "ax"
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/lowlevel_init.S:WEAK(s_init)
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/lowlevel_init.S:ENDPROC(s_init)
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/lowlevel_init.S: bl s_init
Maybe such a default lowlevel_init for armv8 could also have an s_init ?
> What's concern with lowlevel_init()? It's also wired into existing early hook function which's located inside start.S
I would like to avoid duplicating lowlevel_init functionality as much as
possible , common lowlevel_init would be very welcome .
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list