回复: 回复: [PATCH v8 02/19] pinctrl: nxp: add a pin controller driver based on SCMI pin control protocol

[Alice Guo (OSS)]

> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> 发送时间: 2025年4月1日 20:53
> 收件人: Alice Guo (OSS) <alice.guo at oss.nxp.com>; Fabio Estevam
> <festevam at gmail.com>; Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
> 抄送: Lukasz Majewski <lukma at denx.de>; Sean Anderson
> <seanga2 at gmail.com>; Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>; Peng Fan
> <peng.fan at nxp.com>; dl-uboot-imx <uboot-imx at nxp.com>; Alper Nebi Yasak
> <alpernebiyasak at gmail.com>; Alice Guo <alice.guo at nxp.com>; Lothar
> Waßmann <LW at karo-electronics.de>; u-boot at lists.denx.de; Ranjani
> Vaidyanathan <ranjani.vaidyanathan at nxp.com>; Ye Li <ye.li at nxp.com>; Peng
> Fan (OSS) <peng.fan at oss.nxp.com>
> 主题: Re: 回复: [PATCH v8 02/19] pinctrl: nxp: add a pin controller driver
> based on SCMI pin control protocol
> 
> On 4/1/25 12:57 PM, Alice Guo (OSS) wrote:
> 
> Hello Alice,
> 
> >>>>> Both use same ID 0x19.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It is fine to use below, if it is fine to you.
> >>>>> SCMI_PROTOCOL_ID_PINCTRL_IMX = 0x19.
> >>>> How does the kernel discern which driver it should use to
> >>>> communicate with the SCMI provider if both drivers are compiled into
> the kernel ?
> >>>
> >>> There is a check in drivers probe. Only one will succeed.
> >>
> >> I have to admit, this is just ... uhhh :(
> >>
> >> But I think now, we should also have a driver-side check and two
> >> separate drivers, similar to this patch:
> >>
> >> [PATCH] power: regulator: scmi: Move regulator subnode hack to
> >> scmi_regulator
> >
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > When will this patch "[PATCH] power: regulator: scmi: Move regulator
> subnode hack to scmi_regulator" be applied to the uboot next branch? I have
> already made the next version patch set based on this patch.
> Fabio/Tom ?

U-Boot source code I used is cloned by git clone https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot.git