[PATCH v2 3/3] Image size checks: Simplify help text

[Marek Vasut]

On 8/11/25 10:57 AM, Philip Oberfichtner wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2025 at 03:41:57PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 8/7/25 12:24 PM, Philip Oberfichtner wrote:
>>> For coherency, use the same help text for all related size checks
>>> options. Furthermore, simplify the depends-on logic.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Philip Oberfichtner <pro at denx.de>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Notes:
>>>       Changes in v2: new
>>>
>>>    Kconfig | 8 +++-----
>>>    1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Kconfig b/Kconfig
>>> index ec20603883b..490a706101a 100644
>>> --- a/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/Kconfig
>>> @@ -543,10 +543,8 @@ config BOARD_SIZE_LIMIT
>>>    	default 1048576 if RCAR_64
>>>    	default 0
>>>    	help
>>> -	  Maximum size of the U-Boot image. When defined, the build system
>>> -	  checks that the actual size does not exceed it.  This does not
>>> -	  include SPL nor TPL, on platforms that use that functionality, they
>>> -	  have separate options to restrict size.
>>> +	  Specifies the maximum length of the U-Boot image.
>>> +	  If this value is zero, it is ignored.
>>
>> This makes the description less accurate, sorry, NAK.
> 
> What about using just the first half:
> 
> 	Maximum size of the U-Boot image. When defined, the build system
> 	checks that the actual size does not exceed it.
> 	[plus/minus treatment of the value zero]
> 
> And dropping the remainder "This does not include ..."?
Why would removing the SPL/TPL clarification be any improvement ?