[PATCH] arm: dts: k3-am62d-evm-binman: Update DM

Andrew Davis afd at ti.com
Mon Dec 1 19:22:37 CET 2025


On 11/28/25 5:02 AM, Paresh Bhagat wrote:
> AM62d previously reused the AM62a DM. Since a dedicated DM is now
> available, migrate to device specific DM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paresh Bhagat <p-bhagat at ti.com>
> ---
> Boot logs
> https://gist.github.com/paresh-bhagat12/38bce75c43466b5074271f4cb2ddc3f3
> 
>   arch/arm/dts/k3-am62d-evm-binman.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/k3-am62d-evm-binman.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/k3-am62d-evm-binman.dtsi
> index 7bf0e955645..3a0ab9f8b2b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/dts/k3-am62d-evm-binman.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/k3-am62d-evm-binman.dtsi
> @@ -101,4 +101,12 @@
>   	description = "k3-am62d2-evm";
>   };
>   
> +&dm_falcon {

Not related to this patch, but just noticed we have a different DM node for
falcon vs regular, would these ever be different? Could we reuse the same
filename for both, was this a limitation of binman or an oversight?

Anyway for this patch, LGTM,

Reviewed-by: Andrew Davis <afd at ti.com>

> +	filename = "ti-dm/am62dxx/ipc_echo_testb_mcu1_0_release_strip.xer5f";
> +};
> +
> +&dm {
> +	filename = "ti-dm/am62dxx/ipc_echo_testb_mcu1_0_release_strip.xer5f";
> +};
> +
>   #endif



More information about the U-Boot mailing list