[PATCH] clk: Remove myself as a maintainer

[Tom Rini]

On Wed, Dec 03, 2025 at 04:03:35PM -0500, Sean Anderson wrote:

> Unfortunately I don't really have time to review clock patches. When I
> initially started maintaining this subsystem I had more free time than I do
> now. But I also found it hard to motivate myself to review patches.  Many
> clock patches add support for new SoCs and they are time consuming to
> review properly. You effectively have to spend a few hours reading the
> reference manual (if it's public!) and reviewing drivers is no small feat
> either. This is made more difficult since clocking is often very different
> between SoCs and it can be difficult to determine whether something is a
> bug in the driver or a workaround for some hardware behavior. I mostly
> don't care about any given SoC unless I'm hacking on it so I ended up with
> a ton (more than 7000) of unreviewed patches piling up in my inbox. I'd
> love to be more active, but I have a day job and I usually want to work on
> something more interesting when I get home. I still think the clock
> subsystem is a major mess but I don't care enough to fix it :l
> 
> The subsystem itself should probably get orphaned since AFAICT all patches
> go through the mach/arch maintainer or to Tom.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2 at gmail.com>

Thank you for your time and contributions over the years. Applied to
u-boot/master. And yes, we do need to as a community figure out what to
do next with the clk subsystem (and try harder to put SoC-specific parts
under the SoC maintainers).

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20251204/96965675/attachment.sig>