[PATCH v2 0/3] clk: Return value calculated by ERR_PTR

[Nishanth Menon]

On 10:35-20251208, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 15:52-20251208, Andrew Goodbody wrote:

[..]
> > > > Confirmed by reverting the commit. Looks like
> > > > 9ed8fafbcde3425d8817ec5953edd428c7508153 revert is needed again?
> > > 
> > > Interesting, OK. What Andrew did in commit
> > > fe780310cfa8bf5a093894b5cd7fe85c6b02fd91 is more complex than before and
> > > there's two stanzas there. Our lab is current being re-worked again
> > > right now so I can't test on the K3 platforms I have, but can you please
> > > see which of the two changes in clk-uclass.c is the one that breaks
> > > these platforms? Thanks!
> > What is the breakage please? I did put this series through CI and the only
> > issues were due to lack of disk space, so not related to the patches.
> > 
> > Andrew
> > 
> Looks like A72 would'nt get started.. adding a bit of print to get an
> idea:
> 
> https://gist.github.com/nmenon/c0487b99cbd2308ccd11ffe510a780bb
> 


Any suggestions to proceed?

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
https://ti.com/opensource