[PATCH 1/2] net: ravb: Drop empty init callback

Marek Vasut marek.vasut at mailbox.org
Tue Jan 21 13:15:29 CET 2025


On 1/21/25 1:07 PM, Paul Barker wrote:
> On 18/01/2025 06:34, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> The init function does nothing, the bb_miiphy_init() already checks
>> whether the .init callback is assigned, and if not, skips calling it.
>> Remove the empty init function. The entire init callback will be
>> removed in follow up patches.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas at mailbox.org>
>> ---
>> Cc: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth at gmail.com>
>> Cc: Evgeny Bachinin <EABachinin at salutedevices.com>
>> Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas at linaro.org>
>> Cc: Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier at linaro.org>
>> Cc: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger at ni.com>
>> Cc: Mario Six <mario.six at gdsys.cc>
>> Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek at amd.com>
>> Cc: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu at nigauri.org>
>> Cc: Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct at bp.renesas.com>
>> Cc: Ramon Fried <rfried.dev at gmail.com>
>> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>> Cc: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu at linaro.org>
>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
>> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/ravb.c | 7 +------
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ravb.c b/drivers/net/ravb.c
>> index 7286ad19598..f9c27f0f370 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ravb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ravb.c
>> @@ -560,11 +560,6 @@ static int ravb_remove(struct udevice *dev)
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> -static int ravb_bb_init(struct bb_miiphy_bus *bus)
>> -{
>> -	return 0;
>> -}
>> -
>>   static int ravb_bb_mdio_active(struct bb_miiphy_bus *bus)
>>   {
>>   	struct ravb_priv *eth = bus->priv;
>> @@ -626,7 +621,7 @@ static int ravb_bb_delay(struct bb_miiphy_bus *bus)
>>   struct bb_miiphy_bus bb_miiphy_buses[] = {
>>   	{
>>   		.name		= "ravb",
>> -		.init		= ravb_bb_init,
>> +		.init		= NULL,
> 
> Do we need to explicitly set this to NULL? The field should be
> initialised to zero if we omit it.
I don't think it does, this is only a safety assignment until this .init 
callback gets fully removed in follow up series.


More information about the U-Boot mailing list