[PATCH 2/6] km: Kconfig: set KM_RESERVED_PRAM to zero for all designs

[Holger Brunck]

> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 02:57:41PM +0000, Holger Brunck wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 03:22:17PM +0200, Holger Brunck wrote:
> > >
> > > > This area was used for special purposes on kirkwood. On the
> > > > current designs we don't need this anymore.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck at hitachienergy.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  board/keymile/Kconfig | 3 +--
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/board/keymile/Kconfig b/board/keymile/Kconfig index
> > > > 41458813858..3a66b2915ac 100644
> > > > --- a/board/keymile/Kconfig
> > > > +++ b/board/keymile/Kconfig
> > > > @@ -31,8 +31,7 @@ config KM_PHRAM
> > > >
> > > >  config KM_RESERVED_PRAM
> > > >  	hex "Reserved RAM"
> > > > -	default 0x0 if MPC83xx
> > > > -	default 0x1000 if MPC85xx || ARCH_LS1021A
> > > > +	default 0x0
> > > >  	depends on !ARCH_SOCFPGA
> > > >  	help
> > > >  	  Reserved physical RAM area at the end of memory for special
> > > purposes.
> > >
> > > Can the whole thing be removed then? Thanks.
> > >
> >
> > Good point, I can drop it completely. Should I send a v2 for the whole
> > series then or only for this one?
> 
> Assuming there's no conflicts, v2 of just this patch is fine.
> 

Ok done. Unfortunately, the patch shows up as a new patch.
I used the message id from patchwork to keep the relation with:
--in-reply-to=20250714132221.2471558-2-holger.brunck at hitachienergy.com
 
Isn't that the right way to do it?

Best regards
Holger