[PATCH 1/1] pylibfdt: correct license information

[Quentin Schulz]

Hi Heinrich,

On 6/7/25 1:32 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> Setuptools 78.1.1 shows warnings:
> 
> * Pattern 'GPL' did not match any files.
> * Pattern 'BSD-2-Clause' did not match any files.
> * SetuptoolsDeprecationWarning: License classifiers are deprecated.
> 
> Cf. https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/guides/writing-pyproject-toml/#license
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt at canonical.com>
> ---
>   scripts/dtc/pylibfdt/setup.py | 4 +---
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/dtc/pylibfdt/setup.py b/scripts/dtc/pylibfdt/setup.py
> index c6fe5a6a446..487e669f524 100755
> --- a/scripts/dtc/pylibfdt/setup.py
> +++ b/scripts/dtc/pylibfdt/setup.py
> @@ -158,12 +158,10 @@ setup(
>       long_description_content_type="text/plain",
>       url="https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/dtc/dtc.git",
>       license="BSD",
> -    license_files=["GPL", "BSD-2-Clause"],
> +    license_files=["Licenses/gpl-2.0.txt", "Licenses/bsd-2-clause.txt"],
>   
>       classifiers=[
>           "Programming Language :: Python :: 3",
> -        "License :: OSI Approved :: BSD License",
> -        "License :: OSI Approved :: GNU General Public License v2 or later (GPLv2+)",

This is an issue though, as it's supposed to be replaced by the license 
argument to the setuptools.setup() function and we aren't matching there 
(though tbf, we weren't already matching :) ).

Also, I'm not entirely sure BSD is unambiguous?

I would suggest:

license="GPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-2-Clause"

to match the SPDX-License-Identifier at the top if the setup.py file :)

Cheers,
Quentin