[PATCH v4 00/29] arm: Support building as an EFI app
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Wed Mar 5 15:15:16 CET 2025
Hi Igor,
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 07:50, Igor Opaniuk <igor.opaniuk at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Simon,
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 2:08 PM Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > The original x86 EFI-app was written back in 2015, about a year before
> > the EFI-loader was introduced. At that point, ARM mostly used U-Boot and
> > FIT (Flat Image Tree).
> >
> > Today, sadly, there are a few efforts to re-invent FIT poorly, to cater
> > to more primitive boot-environments than U-Boot. One justification for
> > this re-invetion has been that EDK2 did not support FIT.
> >
> > EDK2 does now support FIT but only for the firmware stage. Even then,
> > vendors tend to use their own forks, so any new features are slow to
> > make it into the market.
> >
> > EDK2 also supports the ext4 filesystem, but many devices don't include
> > that feature, so most distros make use of FAT for storing their boot
> > files. Since FAT is not journalled, it is not particularly reliable in
> > the face of reset, power failure, etc.
> >
> > As an interim measure, we can use U-Boot as an EFI app running on top of
> > whatever EDK2 fork is in use. This allows use of modern features such as
> > FIT and filesystems other than FAT. So far this only supports x86, but
> > recent ARM laptops are making use of EFI too.
> >
> > So this series adds an EFI app for 64-bit ARM.
> >
> > Note: Since U-Boot does not support EFI's GOP 'blt-only' mode, the
> > vidconsole does not operate, but it can still be used, since EDK2
> > handles drawing instead of U-Boot. As a result, the U-Boot logo is not
> > shown.
> >
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Got back to depending on HAVE_TEXT_BASE
> > - Drop the confusing comment about position-independent code
> > - Put EFI_LDS back as it is required for building helloword.efi etc.
> > - Put the config.mk changes in the board directory
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Use the same copyright message as the original pci_rom.c file
> > - Rewrite the commit message
> > - Drop setting of EFI_LDS and rely on the CONFIG_SYS_LDSCRIPT value
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Depend on CONFIG_EFI_APP instead
> > - Drop change to u-boot-elf rule
> > - Mention '64-bit ARM' here, rather than just 'ARM'
> > - Drop the word 'Sadly'
> > - Mention '64-bit ARM' here, rather than just 'ARM'
> > - Add new patch to rename VENDOR_EFI to ARCH_EFI
> > - Update to use ARCH_EFI instead of VENDOR_EFI
> > - Mention '64-bit ARM' here, rather than just 'ARM'
> > - Mention '64-bit ARM' here, rather than just 'ARM'
> > - Rework the commit message to clarify the relationship to link-scripts
> > - Expand commit message to explains that EFI_APP skips relocation
> > - Mention '64-bit ARM' here, rather than just 'ARM'
> > - Document the x86 field better and add a comment for ARM too
> > - Mention '64-bit ARM' here, rather than just 'ARM'
> > - Put the EFI-app case first in setup_mon_len(), for clarity
> > - Use ARCH_EFI instead of VENDOR_EFI
> > - Merge the linker-script rules into Kconfig in this patch
> > - Drop patch 'Select the EFI linker script for the app'
> >
> > Simon Glass (29):
> > Makefile: Avoid using TEXT_BASE with the EFI APP
> > video: Move vesa_setup_video_priv() into its own file
> > video: Use a local mode_info struct in the EFI driver
> > lib: Provide fdtdec_get_pci_bar32() only with PCI enabled
> > efi: Rename app and payload to include x86
> > efi: Allow board/efi Kconfig to be used outside x86
> > efi: x86: Move EFI SDRAM-handling into a common file
> > treewide: Rename VENDOR_EFI to ARCH_EFI
> > efi: x86: Rework VENDOR_EFI option to permit other archs
> > efi: x86: Allow setting the global_data pointer with EFI
> > efi: Tidy up setup of global_data
> > efi: Rename ImageBase to image_base
> > efi: lmb: Avoid access to _start
> > efi: arm: Don't do the EL2 switch when running under EFI
> > efi: arm: Avoid allocating page tables when running under EFI
> > efi: arm: Avoid enabling caches when running under EFI
> > efi: arm: Implement access to global_data for EFI
> > efi: arm: Omit the ARM start-up code in the EFI app
> > efi: arm: Drop exception-level code when running as EFI app
> > efi: arm: x86: Allow use of the EFI table in the app
> > efi: arm: Disable --gc-sections for the app
> > efi: arm: Drop startup code from the app
> > efi: arm: Adjust how the monitor length is calculated
> > efi: arm: Provide startup and relocation code
> > efi: Generate the app as a shared library
> > efi: arm: Disable STATIC_RELA for the EFI app
> > efi: arm: Use EFI flags for all compilation with the app
> > efi: arm: Simplify the crt0 file and update link script
> > efi: arm: Add an EFI app for arm64
> >
> > Kconfig | 1 +
> > MAINTAINERS | 4 +-
> > Makefile | 7 +-
> > arch/Kconfig | 2 +
> > arch/arm/Kconfig | 6 +-
> > arch/arm/Makefile | 2 +
> > arch/arm/config.mk | 12 ++
> > arch/arm/cpu/armv8/Makefile | 4 +-
> > arch/arm/cpu/armv8/config.mk | 2 +-
> > arch/arm/dts/efi-arm_app.dts | 31 +++++
> > arch/arm/include/asm/global_data.h | 18 ++-
> > arch/arm/lib/Makefile | 12 +-
> > arch/arm/lib/bootm.c | 7 +-
> > arch/arm/lib/cache.c | 3 +
> > arch/arm/lib/crt0_aarch64_efi.S | 158 ++++----------------------
> > arch/arm/lib/crt0_arm_efi.S | 2 +-
> > arch/arm/lib/elf_aarch64_efi.lds | 49 +++++---
> > arch/riscv/lib/crt0_riscv_efi.S | 30 ++---
> > arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 +-
> > arch/x86/cpu/efi/Makefile | 1 -
> > arch/x86/include/asm/global_data.h | 9 +-
> > board/efi/Kconfig | 44 ++++++-
> > board/efi/efi-arm_app/Kconfig | 19 ++++
> > board/efi/efi-arm_app/MAINTAINERS | 13 +++
> > board/efi/efi-arm_app/Makefile | 5 +
> > board/efi/efi-arm_app/board.c | 18 +++
> > board/efi/efi-arm_app/config.mk | 4 +
> > board/efi/efi-arm_app/efi-arm_app.env | 11 ++
> > board/efi/efi-x86_payload/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > common/board_f.c | 6 +-
> > common/board_r.c | 9 +-
> > configs/efi-arm_app64_defconfig | 51 +++++++++
> > configs/efi-x86_app32_defconfig | 4 +-
> > configs/efi-x86_app64_defconfig | 4 +-
> > configs/efi-x86_payload32_defconfig | 4 +-
> > configs/efi-x86_payload64_defconfig | 4 +-
> > doc/develop/uefi/u-boot_on_efi.rst | 17 +--
> > drivers/pci/pci_rom.c | 32 ------
> > drivers/video/Makefile | 2 +
> > drivers/video/efi.c | 1 +
> > drivers/video/vesa_helper.c | 41 +++++++
> > include/asm-generic/sections.h | 2 +
> > include/vesa.h | 2 +
> > lib/efi/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > lib/efi/Makefile | 1 +
> > lib/efi/efi_app.c | 13 ++-
> > {arch/x86/cpu => lib}/efi/sdram.c | 1 -
> > lib/fdtdec.c | 2 +
> > lib/lmb.c | 3 +-
> > 49 files changed, 431 insertions(+), 250 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/efi-arm_app.dts
> > create mode 100644 board/efi/efi-arm_app/Kconfig
> > create mode 100644 board/efi/efi-arm_app/MAINTAINERS
> > create mode 100644 board/efi/efi-arm_app/Makefile
> > create mode 100644 board/efi/efi-arm_app/board.c
> > create mode 100644 board/efi/efi-arm_app/config.mk
> > create mode 100644 board/efi/efi-arm_app/efi-arm_app.env
> > create mode 100644 configs/efi-arm_app64_defconfig
> > create mode 100644 drivers/video/vesa_helper.c
> > rename {arch/x86/cpu => lib}/efi/sdram.c (94%)
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
>
> It looks like some patches, such as "efi: x86: Move EFI SDRAM-handling
> into a common file,"
> depend on another patch series from Matthew Garrett [1], which has
> already been merged into "ci/master.".
>
> Could you please provide a link to that branch (assuming it's [1])? I
> wasn't able to
> find it in the custodian trees.
>
> [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg528541.html
>
Yes, it is here:
https://sjg.u-boot.org/u-boot/u-boot/-/tree/master?ref_type=heads
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list