[PATCH 6/6] lib: Provide a signed version of simple_itoa()

[Tom Rini]

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 03:04:00PM +0000, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 at 15:20, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 01:12:30PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > Am 19. März 2025 12:59:08 MEZ schrieb Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>:
> > > >In some cases we want to show a signed value to the user without needing
> > > >to use the full printf() implementation. Add a new version of the
> > > >simple_itoa() function to handle this.
> > >
> > > Where will this be used?
> > > Why can't printf be used?
> > > Why would this fit into this series which is about test improvements and not about functional changes?
> >
> > It would be more fair to say that only one patch in this series is about
> > testing and 5 are adding otherwise unused changes to functions that
> > presumably are used in some later as yet to be posted series.
> 
> Sure, would you like me to change the cover letter?

No, I'd like to see the test by itself and defer the unused additions
until there's something to review it alongside of.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20250319/c4c0e36e/attachment.sig>