[PATCH 1/4] cpu: imx8_cpu: Print Speed grade if IMX_THERMAL or IMX_TMU

[Marek Vasut]

On 3/19/25 8:13 PM, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 9:13 PM Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at mailbox.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/19/25 2:42 AM, Adam Ford wrote:
>>> Much of the data that is display by imx8_cpu.c is also
>>> displayed from arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu.c, except the
>>> speed grade and temperature unless the SoC is an i.MX9.
>>> Expand this to include checks for IMX_THERMAL or IMX_TMU
>>> in the same way it's done for mach-imx/cpu.c.
>>>
>>> Before:
>>> CPU:   NXP i.MX8MP Rev1.1 A53 at 1200 MHz
>>> Model: Beacon EmbeddedWorks i.MX8MPlus Development kit
>>>
>>> After:
>>> CPU:   NXP i.MX8MP Rev1.1 A53 at 1200 MHz
>>> CPU:   Industrial temperature grade  (-40C to 105C) at 28C
>>> Model: Beacon EmbeddedWorks i.MX8MPlus Development kit
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173 at gmail.com>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpu/imx8_cpu.c b/drivers/cpu/imx8_cpu.c
>>> index 53d31b3c0bf..facd561022f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/cpu/imx8_cpu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/cpu/imx8_cpu.c
>>> @@ -177,7 +177,9 @@ static int cpu_imx_get_desc(const struct udevice *dev, char *buf, int size)
>>>        ret = snprintf(buf, size, "NXP i.MX%s Rev%s %s at %u MHz",
>>>                       plat->type, plat->rev, plat->name, plat->freq_mhz);
>>>
>>> -     if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMX9)) {
>>> +     if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMX9) ||
>>> +         IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMX_THERMAL) ||
>>> +         IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMX_TMU)) {
>>
>> Can CONFIG_IMX9 instead select CONFIG_IMX_THERMAL or CONFIG_IMX_TMU , so
>> the SoC specific check could be removed from here ?
> 
> Any idea which of IMX_THERMAL or IMX_TMU should be selected or
> implied?  I don't have an IMX9 to test.
git grep says:

drivers/thermal/imx_tmu.c:      { .compatible = "fsl,imx93-tmu", .data = 
FLAGS_VER4, },